The Envelope Logo

Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Curious Oscar wild card: Christian McKay

January 15, 2010 |  6:45 am

Believe it or not, Christian McKay ("Me and Orson Welles") has a real, albeit long-shot, chance of winning best supporting actor at the Oscars — that is, if he can get nominated. And that's a big "if."

Currently, Christoph Waltz ("Inglourious Basterds") is odds-on-fave to prevail on March 7, of course, and he'll probably win both the Critics' Choice Award (for which McKay is nominated) and Golden Globe (for which he is not) this weekend, but Waltz must be leery of McKay after that. The supporting races are the hotbeds of Oscar upsets. Those categories are where voters love to veer from mainstream expectations and jump off cliffs. Think of the jaw-droppers pulled off in past years by, say, Jim Broadbent ("Iris") and Marcia Gay Harden ("Pollock").

Christian mckay me and orson welles news 2

Those are two good examples to cite because Broadbent and Harden have much in common with McKay: They portrayed real-life people — voters are suckers for that — (Broadbent as hubby of novelist Iris Murdoch, Harden as wife of painter Jackson Pollock) and they had lead roles hiding in the supporting category, where size often matters.

McKay portrays that holy terror of showbiz, Orson Welles, who dared to battle the power dragons of the Hollywood film and New York theater worlds. In "Me & Orson Welles," he portrays the notorious rascal at age 22 while staging a shocking adaptation of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" in Manhattan. Variety joined a loud media chorus of cheers for the film: "An extraordinary impersonation of the American theatrical boy wonder by the young English actor Christian McKay is the indisputable highlight of 'Me and Orson Welles.'"

McKay is nominated by the Indie Spirits in addition to the Critics' Choice, so that means he's a player in the awards game. Frankly, it's surprising that he wasn't nominated by Screen Actors Guild, because he stars as one of the sainted giants of the acting biz, but it's possible that the small, obscure indie didn't get proper exposure to the 2,100 members of the nominating committee.

McKay is back in the game at the Oscars because nominations are determined by peer group, but again the actors may experience trouble seeing the film. I think McKay would have a better chance to break in if Freestyle Releasing had sent his DVD earlier to academy members. However, it arrived in voters' mailboxes around mid-December within a day or two of them receiving "Up in the Air," "Invictus," "Star Trek," "The Road," "The Young Victoria," "A Single Man," "Nine," "It's Complicated" and "Fantastic Mr. Fox." Also the DVDs of movies starring McKay's two toughest rivals for the Oscar: "Inglourious Basterds" (Waltz) and "The Lovely Bones" (Stanley Tucci). Two weeks later, voters received their Oscar nomination ballots.

Have voters had enough time to catch up with "Me & Orson Welles"? Accountants say that most voters fill out ballots a week or two after receiving them. The absolute final deadline for ballots to be returned to the academy is Jan. 23. Nominations will be announced on Feb. 2. Below, check out my webcam chat with McKay.

Photo: Christian McKay as Orson Welles. Credit: Freestyle Releasing

Get Gold Derby on Twitter. Join the Gold Derby Group at Facebook. Become friends with Tom O'Neil on Facebook. Get Gold Derby RSS feed via Facebook. RSS Feedburner. RSS Atom.

The comments to this entry are closed.


I don't agree that Jim Broadbent's win for Iris was a "jaw-dropper" - he had already won the Golden Globe, LAFCA and National Board of Review awards for his performance and been nominated for the BAFTA and the SAG, so he was one of the chief contenders.

But thanks for highlighting Christian McKay's fine work in Me and Orson Welles. I am rooting for him for a Best Supporting Actor nomination - he was superb.

I see your point Tom, in your dreams but Christoph Waltz is still going to win every award in sight for Inglourious Basterds because he gave the best supporting actor performance of the year, just because Christian McKay played a real life person doesn't always mean a win. P.S. no actor has ever won a supporting actor oscar who wasn't nominated by the Globes and SAG.

Thanks, Tom, for giving some much needed attention to this performance. I hope AMPAS voters will give him a #1 or #2 vote in the supporting category, as he has no shot in the lead category.

To the AMPAS member--By listing McKay as a lead performer, you've made sure he will not get nominated. It's true McKay has a large part in Me and Orson Welles, but I think the "Me" character is actually the lead role played by Zak Efron.

For those interested - I am a member of AMPAS and listed Mr. McKay's performance among the LEAD actors. It is not a "supporting" role in my opinion; placement is left to the discretion of the nomimator.

I'm hoping he'll do what Michael Shannon did last year and pull through. Early buzz on great performance plus little precursor attention = a somewhat surprise nomination.



In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:

About the Blogger

Pop & Hiss



In Case You Missed It...