New York critics narrowly avoid 'Violence'
At least their clash didn't resemble a cowboy saloon slugfest when backers of "Brokeback Mountain" and "A History of Violence" squared off at Monday's voting session of the New York Film Critics Circle. Their balloting battle was indeed intense, but civil: "Brokeback" won a narrow victory for best picture by a score of 39 to 35, while Ang Lee prevailed as best director over David Cronenberg by a mere two-point edge.
Voting used to get truly violent during the glory (gorey?) days of the circle, back before the 1960s when booze still flowed during balloting conclaves. Fistfights sometimes broke out. Screaming was common. "To put it bluntly, the voting sessions of the critics have sometimes been nigh unto brawls," longtime circle president Bosley Crowther of the New York Times once confessed.
There was even an alleged murder attempt during a voting session when, at the height of Red Scare paranoia in 1951, patriotic members of the circle ganged up on a film reviewer for the Daily Worker, a publication that had been granted membership during the late 1930s when socialism was still chic. Witnesses say some circle members pinned the chap against a wall and might even have killed him if the wily little Bolshevik hadn't slipped from their drunken grasp and escaped, never to return.
Photo: "A History of Violence" lost best picture by 4 votes and the directors' showdown by 2 votes.
(New Line Cinema)
Although booze was banned from circle votes in the 1960s, clashes remained loud and contentious until the 1970s when verbal debate was banned too. But nothing could stop the nasty fights that took place during balloting.
The circle's unique voting system encourages the formation of rival factions that engage in a game some members call "Block the Other Camp." Often members end up focusing more intently on voting against their peers' choices than fighting for their own. Thus "Mulholland Drive" won best picture in 2001 when neither of the camps behind "In the Bedroom" and "Gosford Park" could muster enough support to prevail. Ultimately, after a few brutish ballot rounds, they had to surrender to compromise. Ditto for the best picture victories of "Quiz Show" and "The Accidental Tourist."
But I digress . . . sorry . . .
This year circle President Gene Seymour of Newsday reports, "There wasn't any acrimony." In fact, he adds, "We aren't as contentious as people think. The worst that happened today was there was occasional grumbling around the table and Rex Reed rolled his eyes."
How nice that Rex behaved himself. Legend has it that, back in the glory days of the circle, he screamed unprintable epithets at Pauline Kael, who may have deserved it considering how she used to filibuster proceedings. It was eons ago that Rex got into a fist fight with Manny Farber at a voting session of the National Society of Film Critics (virtually the same as the circle back then — they shared the same members), but everybody's still talking about it.
But I digress again . . . sorry again . . .
Despite outward civility, "'Brokeback Mountain' and 'A History of Violence' went head-to-head in lots of major categories" during voting, reports Thelma Adams of Us Weekly, a staunch Cronenberg soldier. "This year there were two solid camps. Voting wasn't all over the map like it's been in other years. I would've preferred a best picture or director win, but at least we got both supporting categories."
The vote for supporting actress was the only flip-flop of the day. Catherine Keener ("Capote") led on the first ballot, but then lost to Maria Bello of "Violence." Bello's costar William Hurt won supporting actor over Mathieu Amalric ("Munich") and Terrence Howard ("Crash").
In the best picture race, "Good Night, and Good Luck" was a distant third in the tally. Only a vote or two separated "Munich" and "The New World" in the very distant fourth and fifth positions.
The also-rans for best director were Steven Spielberg ("Munich") in third place followed by Terrence Malick ("The New World") and Wong Kar Wai ("2046").
Final scores in the best actor race: Heath Ledger, "Brokeback Mountain" (35), Philip Seymour Hoffman, "Capote" (33), Viggo Mortensen, "A History of Violence" (30), Terrence Howard, "Hustle & Flow" (16).
Final scores for best actress: Reese Witherspoon, "Walk the Line" (31), Emmanuelle Devos, "Kings and Queen" (17), Zhang Ziyi, "2046" and "Memoirs of a Geisha" (14), Q'orianka Kilcher, "The New World" (14), Judi Dench, "Mrs. Henderson Presents" (13).
"All voting lasted only two or three ballot rounds in each category," notes Adams. "There weren't four or five rounds like we sometimes do."
While circle members gathered in the Oak Room of the Algonquin Hotel — once the gathering place of the infamous literary Round Table — the total voting period was brief, lasting less than three hours, commencing slightly after 9 a.m. At one point the meeting was interrupted to announce the winners of the National Board of Review awards. So much for believing those huffy critics when they say that they don't care about NBR, eh?
But they usually do pay careful attention to what their counterparts do in Los Angeles.
"Yes, we care about how the L.A. critics vote," acknowledges NYFCC prez Seymour. "Some years you get the feeling that one group votes one way because the other group voted a different way. In the past there has been a wide disparity between left and right coasts, but this year we all joined hands and got behind 'Brokeback Mountain.'"
Actually, let's give these huffy, bullheaded critics on both coasts their due. Last year they joined hands and chose the same film too — a rarity, granted. Over the past 30 years during their mutual existence (the L.A. group was founded in 1975, the New Yorkers in 1935), they've agreed on best picture 10 times: "Brokeback Mountain," "Sideways," "Saving Private Ryan," "L.A. Confidential," "Leaving Las Vegas," "Schindler's List," "Goodfellas," "Hannah and Her Sisters," "Terms of Endearment" and "Kramer vs. Kramer."


Where can one find on line the final voting? Doesn't seem to be listed on the official website.
Posted by: GChin | December 14, 2005 at 04:23 PM
Answered my own question...three times: Schindler's List, Kramer vs. Kramer and Terms of Endearment...3/10...
Posted by: EDouglas | December 13, 2005 at 05:36 AM
I'm curious...of those 10 times that the LA and NY Film Critics agreed, how many of those pictures actually won for Best Picture that year? Might give a better idea of "Brokeback Mountain"'s chances. :)
Posted by: EDouglas | December 13, 2005 at 05:31 AM
Very ... "interesting."
What I've always thought it is interesting is seeing some years in which a performer wins from all three critics groups (L.A. Film Critics Association, N.Y. Film Critics Circle, and National Society of Film Critics) and the one non-critics organization (National Board of Review). In the past, Sally Field, Meryl Streep, Sissy Spacek, Jack Nicholson, Emma Thompson, and Nicolas Cage won all four, the Golden Globe, and eventually the Oscar.
This year, one person has won all three thusfar announced: "Brokeback Mountain" director Ang Lee. Now in the past, I do recall that Quentin Taratino won all four, in 1994, for "Pulp Fiction" -- and didn't Curtis Hanson ("L.A. Confidential," in 1997) and Steven Soderbergh (in 2000, the year of an Oscar rarity: double director noms for both "Erin Brockovich" and "Traffic") pull off this feat? If I'm correct, then we must note that Tarantino and Hanson were stopped, prior to Oscar time, at the Golden Globes: Tarantino was dealt losses by Robert Zemeckis (for best picture "Forrest Gump") and Hanson was defeated by James Cameron (for best picture "Titanic"). Soderbergh won the Oscar, but lost at the Globes and Directors Guild of America by Ang Lee (for "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon").
How interesting that it is now Lee who may be in this position!
Stay tuned....
Posted by: DS0816 | December 13, 2005 at 12:42 AM
i am so happy about william hurt winning for HISTORY OF VIOLENCE. i'll never forget that small but great stint he put in.
i'd like to see Crash get some recognition too...
Posted by: teri | December 12, 2005 at 11:58 PM
Opps. Got wrong info. Keener did come in second and Keaton thrid....
Posted by: Paul8148 | December 12, 2005 at 11:18 PM
Interesting, want happen to Keener in the later rounds to drop behind Li and Keaton? But I got a feeling that Keaton and Li will catch up at some point in the horse race. I can't see Adams (A Movie to small?), Keener (Great year, but that Capote part is small and low key), Bello (A movie "too hot" for the acemdy) that those three will battle it out for the oscar?
Posted by: Paul8148 | December 12, 2005 at 11:02 PM