Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Oscars theory No. 7: lead stars win supporting category

February 23, 2006 | 11:20 am

If I'm correct about who'll win best supporting actor and actress — George Clooney ("Syriana") and Rachel Weisz ("The Constant Gardener") — one factor will probably play a starring role: the fact that both artists really portray lead characters.

All About Eve

It's one of the oldest tricks in the Oscar book: if you're a lead actor who wants to win bad enough, just swallow hard, slip down into that supporting category and you'll probably clobber all rivals just based on screen time alone. Consider a few of the many examples of supporting-acting winners who arguably were leads on screen: Jennifer Connelly ("A Beautiful Mind"), Angelina Jolie ("Girl, Interrupted"), Kevin Spacey ("The Usual Suspects") and Tatum O'Neal ("Paper Moon").

Clearly, there was no female star who upstaged Eva Marie Saint in "On the Waterfront" as she battled with Marlon Brando, who famously pleaded with her in their big knockout scene, "You love me! I want you to say it to me!" She won that supporting Oscar for the haunting way she delivered her doomed reply: "I didn't say I didn't love you! I said, 'Stay away from me!'"

What all of those champs had in common was that they were relative unknowns when they won. Many Oscar strategists believe it's wise for rookies to campaign in that second tier, even when they actually have more screen time than celebrity costars who get nominated in a lead category. That strategy paid off for Timothy Hutton (his "Ordinary People" costar Mary Tyler Moore lost best actress), Haing S. Ngor ("The Killing Fields" costar Sam Waterston lost best actor) and Jim Broadbent ("Iris" costar Judi Dench lost best actress).

When celebrities try that same ploy, it sometimes backfires. Poor Ethan Hawke actually had the most dialogue and face time in "Training Day," but agreed to step down to the supporting slot so he wouldn't compete opposite costar Denzel Washington, who'd already won that race ("Glory"). Ethan ended up losing while Denzel nabbed Oscar No. 2. Anthony Hopkins and Nicole Kidman only had minimal screen time in, respectively, "The Silence of the Lambs" and "The Hours," but they refused to lower themselves to supporting status and prevailed in lead anyway.

Technically, it doesn't matter which Oscar race you campaign for — voters decide where to put you and they've been known to disagree with choices made by some contenders. Benicio Del Toro ("Traffic") won lead actor at the SAG Awards, but was placed in the supporting race at the Academy Awards, which he also won. Thirteen-year-old Keisha Castle-Hughes was obviously the lead in "Whale Rider," but she campaigned in supporting because that's where academy voters always put kids — except, egads, then. They shocked Keisha by making her the youngest person ever nominated for best actress.

This year Jake Gyllenhaal had a tough time deciding where to compete. Early in Oscar season he declared himself for supporting for "Brokeback Mountain" because it looked like he could be nominated in the lead category for "Jarhead." When "Jarhead" tanked, the Golden Globes put Jake in lead contention for "Brokeback," but he got snubbed due to the glut of major guy performances this year. Lucky for Jake, Oscar voters pushed him back down to supporting where he nabbed a nom. Considering his recent win at the BAFTA Awards and the fact that his movie is the front-runner to win best picture, Jake has a real shot at winning on March 5.

But he must get around Clooney, who also had trouble deciding which race to run in. At first his Oscar strategists decided the issue for him and put him in supporting. When Clooney got wind of it, he disagreed and publicly declared himself in lead. An outcry followed. The "Syriana" star listened carefully to all of the arguments uttered by experts and wisely switched back to supporting. Even if Jake or Paul Giamatti ("Cinderella Man") beat him, it's unlikely that he could beat Philip Seymour Hoffman ("Capote") for best actor.

Photo: Anne Baxter (right, rear) probably would've won best supporting actress of 1950 for "All About Eve," but she acted too much like her screen role as an ingénue hell-bent on upstaging a veteran showbiz diva. Citing the fact that her character's name is in the title of the film, she insisted on campaigning for best actress opposite Bette Davis. Both got nominated and lost when the costars canceled each other out.
(20th Century Fox)

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

It is a crime that Ledger won't win. When will the Academy get over voting for actors who mimic real-life characters over those that create an interesting, fully realized fictional character from a script. How much material did Hoffman have to view and explorefor his performance? Capote was perfect casting, I'll admit, and Hoffman did his homework. He did not create a character. Ledger was working off a greater emotional palette and did an equally remarkable job using an accent.

Does anyone have any specific numbers (minutes or percentage of screen time) regarding Reese Witherspoon in Walk the Line? I know it takes a while for her to even appear in the movie and then she comes and goes depending on what Joaquin Phoenix is doing. There are some stretches where she doesn't appear at all. I'm not criticizing her performance, it just seemed to me that she didn't have that much actual screen time, especially when compared with all of the other nominees.

If Jake Gyllenhaal does grain some last minutes grounds after BAFTA, I think he will stand a better chance to win than Matt Dillon, if the split votes between George Clooney and Paul Giamatti do happen. And growing Jake may well benefit Heath Ledger in his race because their performances are interrelated and it seen hard to award one and ignore the other. Their performances are certainly one of those that will never grow old…….

Many predictions are that Clooney or Giamatti will take Supporting Actor. So, it is with some certaintly that there close race will cancel them out and leave it open for Jake Gyllenhall to come through. Besides, his was really a leading role along w/Heath and the Academy will want to reward Brokeback with one Major Acting award to go along with Best Picture.

I dont think Clooney has a lead role in Syriana. He won't win, it will either go to Giamatti or Gyllenhaal. I think Gyllenhaal can win. His role is a leading role and is bigger than's Clooney in Syriana.

My fingers are crossed for Jake!

Racehl Weisz will win beacuse her performance was the best, not because she had a leading role (which is nto true because she's only in about 40 minutes in the film.)



Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives