Will Harvey take 'Driving Lessons' at Tribeca?
What Oscar hopefuls might emerge this week at the Tribeca Film Festival? Last year Harvey Weinstein acquired "Transamerica" in New York and took Felicity Huffman across America to the Kodak Theater. Now there's a new diva vehicle in the fest lineup that shows off the long-range acting chops of another respected star. Industry-watchers wonder: will Harvey take her and "Driving Lessons" for a spin?
Or will it be hijacked by another savvy Oscar rider like Sony Pictures Classics or Focus Features?
I've already seen "Driving Lessons" and can tell you: it's a helluva ride and it's obvious Oscar bait based on its setup. Two-time past Oscar nominee Julie Walters ("Billy Elliot," "Educating Rita") is a flamboyant, booze-swilling, over-the-hill actress who plays a theatrically outsize Maude (without any icky stuff with the kid) to Rupert Grint's awestruck Harold (he plays Ron Weasley in the "Harry Potter" flicks). She's an eccentric old British bird who lives alone in a big house overstuffed with memorabilia of a long career most distinguished by her once having played a Joan Collins-type bitch on a TV soap. She's in desperate need of a young helper around the joint and that's where Grint comes in, arriving as a shy lad eager to escape his restrictive God-fearing home. She introduces him to highbrow culture by casting him opposite her in "Coriolanus" — mugging it to the max, arms outflung, in her overgrown garden. It doesn't matter that he's only got a learner's permit, not an official driver's license. Next she casts him as her chauffeur, despite his protests, and they embark on a road trip up to Edinburgh where she'll screw up a poetry recital while he, emboldened by what he's learned from Walters, meanders off to discover love at last with a pretty young gal.
Walters is an inspiring and magnetic mentor off her nut like Maggie Smith in "The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie" (Smith's first Oscar victory). Oh, except that she's not recruiting kids to fight for Facism. The fact that Walters portrays an actor instead of a teacher is a plus, considering actors make up the largest chunk of academy voters and they love lampoons of themselves, often nominating roles about hambone overripe thespians past their prime like Annette Bening in "Being Julia," Albert Finney in "The Dresser" and Gloria Swanson in "Sunset Boulevard." Sometimes they even win — like Maggie Smith in "California Suite" or Ronald Colman in "A Double Life."
"Transamerica" won the best actress award for Huffman at Tribeca last year and now "Driving Lessons" is a current frontrunner. Both have ContentFilm behind the wheel. Last year ContentFilm acquired "Transamerica" at the Berlin Film Festival and brought it to Tribeca to sell off U.S. and Canadian rights and, hopefully, to send it Oscar-bound. Since the strategy worked so well once (well, at least for a nomination), the distributor is trying it again with a film that has another tour-de-force diva turn in the driver's seat.
"Driving Lessons" costars former Oscar nominee Laura Linney as Grint's bible-thumping momma and marks the directorial debut of Jeremy Brock, author of the screenplay to "Mrs. Brown" (Oscar nomination for Judi Dench). It's loosely based upon his own experience as a boyhood protege to Oscar champ Peggy Ashcroft, but Brock confesses some embellishments, insisting that his grand Dame wasn't really a secret booze bag.
Photo: "Harry Potter's" Rupert Grint resists, but Julie Walters insists upon teaching him an appreciation for the free-wheeling bohemian life in "Driving Lessons."
(ContentFilm International)


Thank you jesi,
Pamela sounds just like Kate on the new article posted by this author. But, this time, she's not an actress, but a critic.
Posted by: AJ | May 22, 2006 at 07:55 PM
Well AJ, that only means, in short, that Rupert is indeed a good actor because he correctly executed what was asked of him by the director. I don't think Pamela has really seen the movie because her statement seem to be a combination of some of the reviews I've read of the movie so far (and I've read them all), even exactly quoting some of them .
Posted by: jesi | May 22, 2006 at 10:17 AM
Hello all,
It's ok to disagree. I saw the film as well at the screening that the cast and filmmakers attended.
I have to say that I enjoyed the film. Some negative comments regarding Rupert is about his expression in the beginning of the movie and the Shakespearian acting.
I choose to look at the character of Ben and the context in which these things occured, and not at Rupert, the actor.
About the stoney-faced look. Consider Ben's background, situation and upbringing. The poor child's repressed. Therefore, he's putting himself sort of in a disconnect from his environment. He has to endure what's going on around him, his mother, the strange man living in his house, being a tree in a play, He's use to it and very obedient, therefore, will not question it (until he meets Evie.) He's ammune to it. He's decidedly zoned out from it.....
Consider character analysis' of other film characters in movies that are compared (to an extent) to this one...
"Appearing slightly shy and unprepossessing, his face has a blank, expressionless, enervated, zombie-like look." [refering to the character of Ben in the Graduate]
~http://www.filmsite.org/grad.html
"A dead-pan disllusioned 20-year old..."
"Everyone with a beating heart should be able to identify with Harold, a repressed youth dominated by his mother." [both refering to Harold from Harold and Maude]
~http://www.dramatica.com/story/analyses/harold_and_maude.html
About the Shakespeare. Here's a boy who as it is known, is very repressed. He's very quiet and doesn't say much. According to Evie, he lacks curiosity. So, he's never really been exposed to Shakespeare. Would you expect Ben (not Rupert) to be very good at reading Shakespeare at his first exposure. Him [Ben] being good at reading poetry is not the point of the scene (yes, I know Evie called him a natural.) It's about him being a caterpiller coming out of his crystalis as a beautiful butterfly. He's about his loosing up. It's about his enjoying himself and having fun.
It's ok not to like Rupert's performance. But, many criticisms (not just the one above so I hope this isn't seen as a targeting...) seem to be directed at Rupert but are actually on characteristics of Ben.
If Rupert as Ben is stoney-faced, it's for a reason.
If Rupert as Ben is bad at Shakespeare, it's for a reason.
Rupert might be bad at Shakespeare, who knows. But, if that is the case, in this roll he's perfectly cast, because is no Shakespearean actor.
Posted by: AJ | May 21, 2006 at 06:53 AM
Sorry but I totally disagree with you, I was one of the persons who saw this movie, and it was a bit boring at times, I didn't like Rupert's performance in many scenes, he had a stone face at the beginning, I couldn't feel anything for him, he wasn't warn enough for me, then he change his acting and at times he was too force, I didn't like the Shakespeare part, he wasn't convincing enough for those lines.
Julie was the one who stole the show, she was great and she was the one who brought live to this movie, I think she save this movie from been a disaster.
Pamela, and I am an actress, thanks for your time
Posted by: Pamela | May 19, 2006 at 07:16 PM
This is definately the best article I've read so far about Rupert's movie-"Driving Lessons" .I can't wait for it to come out in the theaters. I know it will do well. Especially with all the HP Fans behind him as well!!!
Posted by: Mary | April 27, 2006 at 02:28 PM
I, too would love to see Rupert get the nod. Unfortunately, no matter how amazing his performance is, he won't win anything, and probably won't even get a nod, because the Academy tends to not recognize young actors. But if Rupert keeps up the way he is, I'm sure we'll one day see him making his acceptance speech at the Oscars.
Posted by: Elizabeth | April 26, 2006 at 07:47 PM
I can't wait to see this movie! I'm a fan of both Rupert's and Julie's, and I think it will be very entertaining! The award voters are bound to notice.
Posted by: Tasha | April 24, 2006 at 04:20 PM
This article is absolutely awesome! I am so proud of Rupert. I know this film will be great, and the thought that it might even be nominated for an oscar is just icing on the cake. I know (as well as other people) how talented he truly is, and we don't need the ocsars to confirm that.
But I'm not saying it wouldn't be nice to see the movie get an Oscar nomination... or *gasp* a win.... :D
Posted by: me | April 23, 2006 at 10:43 PM
This is a great article. I'm so excited about this movie. I can't wait to see it. I'm one of Rupert's biggest fans and I'm so very proud of him and it would be so wonderful if this movie got a Oscar nomination and won. This is only the beginning for Rupert.
Posted by: Darlene | April 23, 2006 at 07:01 PM
I agree with you Jesi...Totally!
If he did get nominated or perhaps got one
I'll laugh in those people's face, who ever said his acting was appalling!
Posted by: Izzy | April 23, 2006 at 06:34 PM
Hola... yo soy de Chile... Rupert Grint es para mi un exelente actor, creo que tiene un futuro muy prometedor, y que va a llegar muy lejos, espero que la pelĂcula lleguĂ© a los cines en Chile... y poder ver a Ruper actuando...
Posted by: Camila | April 23, 2006 at 04:24 PM
Great article. I'm excited to see Rupert Grint along with Julie Walters taking on different roles outside of Harry Potter. Driving Lessons sounds like a true Oscar contender.
Posted by: Jerrica | April 23, 2006 at 10:58 AM
This is one the best articles I have ever read on Driving Lessons.
Posted by: Cari | April 23, 2006 at 09:21 AM
OMG! I hope Rupert Grint gets some nods too!!! *faints*
Posted by: jesi | April 23, 2006 at 01:06 AM