TV leaders: Release Emmy info
Since this is the first year that the Academy of TV Arts & Sciences is trying the new nomination system, it's understandable that it wants to keep results under wraps. Some egos may be bruised if certain Hollywood heavyweights see that they haven't made the lists. Or would they really be miffed? The Envelope asked some TV industry leaders from networks, PR agencies and the media what they think. We even asked a few actors who, we believe, made the cut-off. A few declined to comment, but all others told us that they support the idea of releasing info about who the Emmy finalists are. We found no one who objects.
RICHARD LICATA, EVP CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, SHOWTIME: "After all the DVD packaging, and all of the advertising strategies, and all of the Emmy prognostication by journalists and industry wags it would be somewhat of a relief to know who the 10 finalist are--especially with the Academy's new voting policy promising to breathe important new life into the Emmy derby. Let's share the good news. God knows we wait long enough to hear it."
STAN ROSENFELD, CELEBRITY PUBLICIST: "I'm in agreement with the others. I think the names should be released, because on Aug. 27, only one name is read anyway."
RAY RICHMOND, EMMY WRITER, HOLLYWOOD REPORTER: "Without doubt the TV Academy should be releasing the names of the finalists if only because there is no explainable reason not to. Why is this considered confidential information? The only conclusion is that ATAS has something to hide. This is also massively disrespectful of the process and contemptuous of those who gave a weekend of their time to serve as judges. Failing to release the names cements the impression that the pros who lent their expertise over the weekend participated in something furtive and almost shameful rather than entirely noble. If these performers and producers at least knew they were short-list finalists, it would conceivably take some of the sting out of failing to be recognized in the end. At the same time, it steals none of the suspense/thunder from the July 6 nominations announcement itself. If anything, it helps build greater momentum."
QUENTIN SCHAFFER, SENIOR VP, CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, HBO: "Yes, we would be in favor of releasing the names of series and stars who made the list of finalists as it's the first step of recognition in the nomination process and seems only fair that they be accorded some attention."
JOHN SOLBERG, SENIOR VP, PUBLIC RELATIONS, FX NETWORKS: "Yes, I think the TV academy should reveal who made the lists of finalists. Actually, I think it would be great to see how many votes everybody got -- just like you can see in political elections, the Heisman Trophy and the Sy Young Awards. I've always been dying to know how 'Nip/Tuck' did its first two years on the air. Did it ALMOST make it into the top 5 for best drama series? Or did it land at number 12? Or further back? Whatever the truth is, I can take it."
MIKE AUSIELLO, SENIOR EDITOR, TV GUIDE.COM: "The TV Academy releases the pre-noms in the Daytime Emmy race, so I see no reason not to make the Primetime semi-finalists available as well. At the very least, they should tell us if Lauren Graham made the top 10, 'cause that's all anyone really cares about."





