Does Harvey have a new blonde muse?
Step aside and make way for a real hot awards contender: Sienna Miller is coming on strong as a late-breaking Oscar rival — some gurus even dare to say frontrunner — in the best-actress derby.
Mad awards joy is erupting within Harvey Weinstein's trackside box as his execs and Oscar consultants cheer on a fast-trotting dark horse, "Factory Girl," featuring Sienna as Edie Sedgwick, the debutante party girl who Andy Warhol turned into a pop icon before she descended into lunacy and addiction hell, ultimately dying of a drug overdose in 1971. Harvey and team recently viewed a rough cut of "Factory Girl" and were wowed by what they saw, a nice surprise that arrived late in awards season thanks to production delays caused by hurricane Katrina.
Two of The Envelope's kudos gurus have put Sienna in their top five for best actress — Jeffrey Wells of Hollywood-Elsewhere.com and Peter Travers of Rolling Stone — two guys who know the Oscar beat well. Jeffrey's seen a rough cut, too, and reports, "she kills in it." Based on all of the gushing scuttlebutt I'm hearing, I sure plan to put her in my top 5 as well.
Last year Harvey Weinstein had the Oscar rival who gave the best performance — Felicity Huffman in "Transamerica" — but she lost to the Babe of the Year who gave a rather pedestrian, supporting turn in "Walk the Line." Reese Witherspoon nonetheless won, probably for her past, more-worthy work in "Election" and "Legally Blonde," and, of course, for looking so darn pretty, perky and youthful. Helen Mirren ("The Queen"), Annette Bening ("Running with Scissors"), Judi Dench ("Notes on a Scandal") and Meryl Streep ("The Devil Wears Prada") have good reason to start getting nervous right now about Sienna. Ditto for Penelope Cruz ("Volver"), the only rival babe in the race up to this point.
"Sienna is so amazing in the film that Harvey's planning a big, last-minute academy push," says an aide-de-camp of The Happy Oscar Warrior. "He'll release 'Factory Girl' at the end of December — we don't know the specific day yet — and he's convinced she can win. Sienna's the new 'It Girl' — she's stylish, gorgeous, British and she really did her homework to prepare for the role.
"This really puts Harvey in a terrible spot, though, because he's also planning to push hard for Renee Zellweger in 'Miss Potter,'" adds the source. "Harvey has a special thing for Renee. He adores her. They're very close." Renee has never won best actress — just that supporting trophy for "Cold Mountain," the poor thing — and inside sources say she's good enough, acting-wise, as Peter Rabbit novelist Beatrix Potter to win. In fact, they say this is the best perf of her career. But she's matronly in the movie. She certainly doesn't have The Babe Factor like "Factory's" star and that's what usually wins Oscars for actresses, of course.
Oh, yeah, one last thing: Guy Pearce is said to be aces as Andy Warhol in "Factory Girl," too — good enough for a best actor bid, if he gets lucky. But who needs luck when you've got Harvey on your team, eh? And everybody says Ewan McGregor is charming as Potter's publisher and doomed fiance Norman.
Photos of The Harvey Girls: Drab-looking Renee Zellweger (bottom right) has every good reason to be leery of babe-a-licious Sienna (top), but things could be worse. At least she wasn't forced to look too much like the real Miss Potter (bottom left). (Weinstein Co.)




Oscar nomination for Sienna Miller ??? NO WAY
I'm sorry but I still remember Sienna Miller, after last year's Academy Awards, trying to have public sex with Sean Penn at the bar of the Chateau Marmont Hotel on Sunset Strip, in full view of hundreds of Hollywood producers, directors, and other moguls.
In "Factory Girl" Sienna Miller attempts to portray Edie Sedgwick, who was a real life muse of PITTSBURGH'S Andy Warhol.
After Sienna Miller's RECENT crude comments and bizarre DIVA behavior in Pittsburgh during the filming of "The Mysteries of Pittsburgh", do you really think that the hundreds of producers, directors, actors and writers in Hollywood that were either born in Pittsburgh or attended College in Pittsburgh would ever vote for the idiot Sienna Miller ???
Harvey & Bob Weinstein, save your money instead of wasting it on a Sienna Miller campaign.
Posted by: JET | October 28, 2006 at 05:51 AM
Sienna Miller ??? NO WAY
I'm sorry but I still remember Sienna Miller, after last year's Academy Awards, trying to have public sex with Sean Penn at the bar of the Chateau Marmont Hotel on Sunset Strip, in full view of hundreds of Hollywood producers, directors, and other moguls.
In "Factory Girl" Sienna Miller attempts to portray Edie Sedgwick, who was a real life muse of PITTSBURGH'S Andy Warhol.
After Sienna Miller's RECENT crude comments and bizarre DIVA behavior in Pittsburgh during the filming of "The Mysteries of Pittsburgh", do you really think that the hundreds of producers, directors, actors and writers in Hollywood that were either born in Pittsburgh or attended College in Pittsburgh would ever vote for the idiot Sienna Miller ???
Harvey & Bob Weinstein, save your money instead of wasting it on a Sienna Miller campaign.
Posted by: JET | October 27, 2006 at 01:46 AM
What exactly is the "Oscar buzz" for Sienna Miller based on?
Helen Mirren and Meryl Streep (though her performance in "The Devil Wears Prada" is more of a supporting role in my opinion) have earned Oscar contendership this year based on spectacular reviews from legions of critics and fans around the world (not to mention a long tradition of brilliant performances).
Sienna Miller, on the other hand, is being deemed as a "hot" Oscar contender, even a "front runner" based on the "rave" reviews of a small handful of critics who were afforded a preview of the "rough cut" version of the film and one of the most manipulative, shameless and blatant Oscar campaigns in recent memory (which may well backfire on Harvey Weinstein and company). This is high praise indeed for a performance in a film which is not only unreleased at this point but, is not even COMPLETED yet (it is reportedly still in post-Production).
Miller may indeed have given the most extraordinary performance of the year, but perhaps we should wait until this film is released (and viewed by more than tiny coterie of critics) before touting her as an Oscar shoo-in.
Posted by: Lorraine Grimes | October 26, 2006 at 05:39 PM
By trashing Reese Witherspoon's performance you only server to discredit yourself. Anyone who would characaterize such a subtle and complex performance as "pedestrian" doesn't know much about acting and certainly has no business writing about it. "Babe factor?" Go apply for a job with US Weekly, clown.
Posted by: Tim | October 02, 2006 at 10:39 AM
Don't forget Kate WInslet in "Little Children."
Posted by: Kathleen | September 30, 2006 at 06:23 AM
Best female performance this year in a film that, depressingly, has no firm release date: Amber Tamblyn in Stephanie Daley. But even if the film is released, the subject matter makes it a non-starter with timid Academy voters. And you've overlooked Ryan Gosling, for Half Nelson. An extreme long-shot, to be sure, but a dynamic, engrossing performance by a gifted actor that deserves a mention. It's not unheard of for an indie to score with Oscar--Hillary Swank in Boys Don't Cry comes to mind.
Posted by: elizabeth | September 30, 2006 at 01:20 AM
I second Josh. Why are you STILL trashing on Reese Witherspoon? Haven't you gotten over that yet?
Posted by: Tristan | September 29, 2006 at 11:04 AM
Who will go see The Queen - Helen Mirren - excellent actress; Annette Bening would get a sympathy vote, but not to win...Judi Dench is fabulous but nobody cares, she has too many already, ditto for Meryl - love her - she was fantastic in Prada - she needs another one I think, still youthful and excellent along with most nominations in history...Penelope Cruz - please - not even close....
Posted by: Mary Copeland | September 28, 2006 at 11:55 AM
Actually Felicity Huffman's performance was the more "pedestrian" of the two. And you can add overwrought as hell. And let me guess, if there had been just one more week for ballets Felicity would have won in the end? Even though Reese took home not just every major award, but every award last Oscar season? Just because you were the only one predicting Felicity, and you were wrong, doesn't mean you have to keep downgrading Reese's beautiful, graceful work in "Walk the Line", which is truly great acting, no fuss, no tricks, and no prosthetics. She didn't win because she was a babe, she won because every since people saw her performance at Toronto they couldn't stop talking about it, and they never stopped talking about it.
As for Siena, no she's not going win. Period. Yeah she could get nominated if she's good enough, and the babe thing might help her get in to round things out (like Kiera last year), but just like Kiera she's too untested to become a winner so soon.
Posted by: Josh | September 26, 2006 at 09:21 PM