Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Weird award choices in Toronto

September 16, 2006 |  4:42 pm

Torontoawardwinners

After giving such a lovely performance as young Judy Garland in the TV mini "Me and My Shadows," Tammy Blanchard must really give a beaut turn in "Bella" because the on-screen chemistry between her and Eduardo Verastegui as budding lovers is apparently what earned it the coveted audience award at the Toronto International Film Festival.

Coveted because its recipient usually reaps more top kudos later. Consider some of the previous winners of the audience award over the past 10 years: "Tsotsi" (Oscar for best foreign film), "Hotel Rwanda" (Golden Globe nominee for best drama picture; star Don Cheadle nommed for Globe, Oscar and everything else), "Whale Rider" (Keisha Castle-Hughes became the youngest Oscar nominee for best actress), "Amelie" (2 BAFTA wins; 5 Oscar noms, including best foreign film), "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" (Oscar for best foreign film, nommed for best pic), "American Beauty" (5 Oscars, including best picture), "Life Is Beautiful" (Oscar for Roberto Begnini, nommed for best pic) and "Shine" (Oscar and Golden Globe for Geoffrey Rush, nommed for best pic).

But did it really win? Word of its victory leaked out while many screenings continued, which means votes pooled from those audiences wouldn't count. Indeed, the official announcement came even before the last fest showing of "Bella." One Toronto blogger fumed: "Festivalgoers have long suspected that the ballots handed out at every screening at the festival were being shoveled into the nearest convenient furnace as soon as they are turned in, and TIFF's awkward timing with the 'Bella' news may have inadvertently conceded the point." Read more - CLICK HERE.

"Bella" was a suspicious choice because the film had such a low profile at the fest. In fact, I didn't hear anyone mention it over my nine days in Toronto. "Bella" is by a first-time filmmaker (Alejandro Monteverde) and follows the rather ho-hum story of a man and woman who flee their restaurant jobs and grow close while journeying through New York City one day.

The audience award wasn't the only strange kudo bestowed at the fest. For the 15th year, the International Federation of Film Critics piped in with its choice for best pic, usually citing an obscure Korean or Algerian film that's quickly forgotten after its brief moment in the critics' spotlight. This year, however, they picked one of the fest's most high-profile — and infamous — movies: "Death of a President," which imagines the future assassination of George W. Bush. Hmmmm. Could that be more of a comment on what those foreign critics think of Bush rather than what they think of the movie? Variety and Hollywood Reporter called it a skillfully made production, but otherwise shrugged it off. Variety summed up: "Disappointingly, 'Death of a President' shrinks from its promise as a piece of genuinely radical or adventurous speculative fiction." I could be mistaken, but I believe this is the first year in eons that no U.S. journalist served on the critics' award jury.

Top photo: Fest audience award champ "Bella." Middle photo: "Dixie Chicks: Shut Up and Sing" was second runner-up for the audience award. Bottom photo: "D.O.A.P." is the first well-known film to win the critics' prize in recent years.
(Metanoiz Films/ Weinstein Co./ Newmarket)

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

I looked into the voting process at TIFF and apparently they hired a 3rd party accounting firm to administer the votes. According to them the official voting was complete by saturday morning and the official awards ceremony was between 12pm and 2pm. Apparently the final screening for Bella was after the awards ceremony and that screening along with the others at that time did not qualify for the vote tally.

Bella was very touching movie that surprises you with a great last half. The emotional ending probably helped with the peoples choice votes. My guess. It's only weakness was a slow beginning. I assume they will fix that before going to theatres. They should, otherwise it was a very good movie.

As per the IMDb, a mere four years ago there was no US critic in the FIPRESCI jury. As for the critics' "obscure" choices, I think that's not only fine but also welcome. It's always refreshing when someone -- or some ones -- opt for film quality instead of p.r. quantity. If more journalists - like those who write for the popular The Envelope - paid more (any?) attention to small, non-English-language films, a number of little-known gems might have a better chance to find distribution (whether in theaters or DVDs) in the US and elsewhere. Then, instead of being dismissed as "obscure" those films would be known as "cult classics."

It's up to journalists and critics to make the general public aware of quality filmmaking coming out of unexpected places.

But then THR and Variety kinda liked Bobby which was utter junk so maybe THR and Variety are the ones with skewed (read that liberal) politics.



Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives