More proof that Oscar winners are crazy
I hate to beat up on such a seemingly classy dame as Ellen Burstyn — especially after the thrashing she took at the recent Emmys for the nom she got for a nine-second turn in "Mrs. Harris." That wasn't her fault. But what is her fault is her ditsy, diva attitude toward the Emmys, Oscars, Golden Globes and Tonys throughout a long career sparkling with many of those wins.
That attitude is expressed at length in her new memoir, which is an OK book, actually, if you don't fall asleep while reading its title — "Lessons in Becoming Myself." Why, oh, why couldn't the star of "The Exorcist" think of something better like "My Devil Within"? It's not as if she doesn't believe in wacky spiritual stuff that could freak out Shirley MacLaine. Among the people she credits with playing a star role in helping her to find herself is a psychic nutritionist.
But what's really loony in this book is reading what she has to say about, say, the Oscars. Starting with her nom for "The Last Picture Show," she writes: "The Academy Awards ceremony was five days away and I was struggling to achieve clarity about the whole competitive Oscar circus. I decided not to attend the ceremonies. Not because I didn't want to win, but because I did. I could feel just how strong in me the desire was and it didn't seem healthy . . . At the time, that was my thinking. But I must ask now, was it not also guilt? In the culture in which I grew up, a woman was supposed to be shorter than a man, make less money, have less, say less and be less. And any woman who did not stay within that boundary was a castrator."
Mind you, Burstyn only came to this decision at the last moment, after she'd attended rehearsals, after the academy allotted her a seat and expected her to fill it. Lucky for everybody, they weren't embarrassed on awards night. She lost to costar Cloris Leachman — while Burstyn watched on TV. Apparently, that was OK to do, even though it wasn't healthy for her to care about that competition. Apparently, she didn't castrate any men by hanging out with pals (some of them male) and watching the Oscar fete on the tube.
What a crock! Why can't these stars with their massive, pampered egos just admit they don't attend showbiz awards because they can't bare the embarrassment of losing in public? Isn't that the reason? Or no? When she was nommed for "The Exorcist," she planned not to go and had a good excuse: she was shooting the movie that would finally win her the gold — "Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore." But Warner Bros. sent the corporate jet to fetch her and she didn't dare tussle with those devils, so she went.
CLICK HERE to continue reading more of this Oscar crock!
Photo: In her new book, Burstyn discusses her six Oscar noms — "Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore" (win), "Requiem for a Dream," "Resurrection," "Same Time, Next Year," "The Exorcist" and "The Last Picture Show." She also received Golden Globe noms for those same roles, but lost her bid for "Alice" to Gena Rowlands in "A Woman Under the Influence." However, she won a Globe for "Same Time, Next Year," tying Maggie Smith ("California Suite") in the comedy/musical actress race. Burstyn's been nominated three times for Emmys, but never won.
(Riverside Books)
Later, when she was nommed for "Alice," she was appearing on Broadway in "Same Time, Next Year" (which would earn her a Tony later), but she still could've gone to the Oscars. Everyone expected her to attend and producers even gave her permission. However, she said that she didn't want to disappoint her Broadway fans. Really? So disappointing a far greater number of her other fans by not appearing at the podium as Oscar winner was a better choice? What rubbish! In "Lessons in Becoming Myself," she admits, "I must confess that this moral high ground was not so difficult for me to take because I have very ambivalent feelings about awards and award shows. Part of my character loves to put on a pretty dress and go out on the red carpet and shine my false smile for the cameras. But I don't consider that the best part of me or the deepest or most real. So when there's a choice I have to go with my better self."
By the way, she had a choice not to attend the Oscars in 2000 when she was nommed for "Requiem for a Dream," a role she initially turned down ("I thought it was too dreary, too hard") until her shrewd agent brought her to her senses (temporarily). But she attended the Academy Awards.
Mysteriously, her better self somehow changed its better mind. She even attended the National Board of Review that year and had a merry ole time. I could tell. I sat a few feet away from her at the next table. A few months later when she passed me on the red carpet at the Oscars, I could see that she was happy to be there and she says so in her memoirs.
"I even had a good time," she writes. "My favorite designer in San Francisco, Catherine Bacon, made a dress for me that I loved and I got to wear a Christian Dior diamond and gold necklace that was like a sunburst around my neck. I must say I looked just as I felt. It was as though in the 20 years since I'd attended this strange rite, I'd been cleansed, swept clean of my psychic demons, the cobwebs of guilt and shame had been vacuumed away and the walls of my inner room were flooded with light. I could walk down the red carpet knowing it was a return into the spotlight from the recesses of my travels in psychic spiritual darkness and I felt like light was able to shine through me. I had polished my mirror."
The mirror bit has something to do with God smiling through (don't ask) and is as nonsensical, inconsistent and ridiculous as her attitude about showbiz awards, which is really an outrage considering one revealing thing about this book. On the inside back flap is a seven-line description of Burstyn and her career. Half of the wordage has to do with showbiz awards: "She has been nominated six times for an Academy Award, and won the Best Actress Oscar in 1974 for 'Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore,' as well a Tony for her performance in 'Same Time, Next Year.'"
At least she had the good sense this year not to attend the Emmys. She didn't need a psychic nutritionist to tell her she'd lose for a role that would've turned out to be shorter than her acceptance speech.
I wouldn't mind if she chose not to attend the Oscars or Emmys for a real, specific reason and then embraced that view consistently, but she flips and flops and tries to sell us old, stinking baloney and expects us to be dumb enough, or star-struck enough, to swallow it. Then she upchucks all that and decides to attend a showbiz award and suddenly appreciates its value. Jeeeeeeeeeez!




I agree with Bryan - the Oscars were a totally different kettle of smelly fish in the 70's and early 80'2. Even Dustin Hoffman was on the record as calling them "obscene". Funny how he changed his tune when it was his turn to win one for Kramer vs Kramer and therefore double or triple his salary. Burstyn does sound a little odd but I think it had more to do with the times.
Posted by: TorontoTom | October 11, 2006 at 11:55 AM
If I remember correctly, during the 70s there was a significant amount of turmoil among celebs about the merits of the Oscars. It is possible that burstyn went through this and has since changed her mind.
As much as I love watching the oscars, winning an oscar ISN'T that big of a deal. There are many people who haven't won that have incredible careers as actors, writers and directors. Plus, Ms. Burstyn has every right to cancel at the last minute as to whether she wants to attend the show. Maybe she does make excuses on why she wants to go or not go....That is her choice to do.
I think your reaction to this book is really OVER the top. Why does this bother you so much? I guess that is the bigger question?
Posted by: Bryan | October 10, 2006 at 05:38 PM