Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Leo goes supporting for 'Departed' at SAG

January 3, 2007 |  8:11 pm

"DiCaprio screwed again?" asks Kris Tapley at InContention.com, reporting that Leo appears in the supporting slot on the SAG ballot for "The Departed." Of course, at the Golden Globes, Leo's classified as lead and competes against himself in "Blood Diamond" for best drama actor. That's certainly a screwy situation! But that's a scenario beyond Leo's control. The Globes have a qualifications committee that came up with that classification.

Departedleo

What Kris means is that Leo may have been screwed at SAG by Warner Bros., which produced both films. At the guild awards, placement is determined by contenders — or, in Leo's case, by his handlers. When actors enter the race, they must follow these instructions on the submission form: "The following information must be included on all forms: (a) Full and complete name of actor(s) as listed in the film's credits. (b) Category in which the submission is to be placed."

I tried to get a peek at the SAG ballot — or at least to get the guild to answer basic questions like which categories Leo and Jennifer Hudson compete in, but its spokesperson clammed up, acting tough, "The ballot is confidential. We cannot disclose who submitted or in which category." Why? The Globes and Emmys, by contrast, always tell me what categories contenders have landed in. The Oscars can't do that because the issue is left wide open. Academy members can choose to put Leo in lead or supporting for "Departed" and there's no way we'll know till noms are announced. The SAGs have a policy of needless paranoid secrecy that betrays the open spirit of a guild — a community of peers who get together for open discussion of important issues, including the bestowal of awards for professional excellence — and is contrary to how things are run by every other major showbiz award. Shame, shame, shame on guild leaders for their bureaucratic bully stance. You expect that nonsense from Jimmy Hoffa's crooked, Mafia-choked guild for dees-and-dems guys, not a supposedly enlightened guild for showbiz sophisticates. It's an outrage that SAG doesn't put all available info out in the open. If anybody's getting screwed during awards season, it's SAG members by their power-mad, controlling chiefs. But, ahem, I digress . . . .

Let's get back to Leo, who's really being shafted by "Blood Diamond" just being in the race. While Leo has more screen time in it than he does in "Departed" and he's got that thick, mouthful-of-South-African-cheese accent (showbiz award voters are usually suckers for that stuff), it's the kind of commercial film that doesn't get Oscar bids (it's got that Big Political Message, sure, but it's basically a two-hour chase flick). But Leo's handlers are looking after the studio's best interests by trying to keep both films in the running. But there's no way that Leo will be nominated at the Oscars for "Blood Diamond" and if its existence pushes Leo into supporting for "Departed," he risks getting clobbered there by "Dreamgirls'" Eddie Murphy. Frankly, Leo's best shot to win an Oscar is in the lead actor race for "Departed," which will be nominated for best picture and may win. Oscar voters love to pair up awards for best pic and actor — think Russell Crowe and "Gladiator," Kevin Spacey and "American Beauty," Dustin Hoffman and "Rain Man," Tom Hanks and "Forrest Gump," Anthony Hopkins in "Silence of the Lambs." You get the idea. That linkage is so strong in voters' minds that a best-actor bid for Leo could even help "Departed" to win the top race.

A month ago I asked Leo what he thinks of this whole debate. He shrugged his shoulders and said, "I try to stay out of it. This is one of those things I don't know enough about, frankly, so I gotta defer to wiser heads than mine, if you know what I mean." Then he winked that Leo wink at me.

I was so charmed suddenly that I forgot to grab him by the shoulders, give him a good shake and roar, "Snap out of it! Do you know that you're getting screwed?!" But I failed to snap out of it myself and missed my big chance to rescue a poor, longtime Oscar snubbee adrift at sea. Leo, are you reading this? Your Oscar ship has hit another iceberg . . . .

(Photo: Warner Bros.)

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Leo should win for either the Departed or Blood Diamond. They were both great movies and really well done. He's done so many great movies which in clude what's eating Gilbert Grape, the Aviator and THE Titanic. This is his YEAR. GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why does Leo do all of these extroadinary movies and never get an oscar? He was amazing in What's Eating Gilbert Grape. I totally believed him. In Blood Diamond his accent was amazing and he just had a great performance. He was also good in the Departed and should nominated for best actor, not best supporting actor. None of the other nominees did as good a job. This year is Leo's year to win an oscar because he was the best actor and still is the best.

Brian raises a good point

Look at this list:

What's Eating Gilbert Grape
Titanic
Gangs of New York
The Aviator
The Departed
Blood Diamond

In addition to other well-received projects like Marvin's Room, The Basketball Diaries, Catch Me If You Can and Romeo + Juliet.

This sentence sounds ridiculous, but is true: At the age of 32, DiCaprio is overdue.

Not sure why the Academy and the SAG and just about ervery other award entity has snubbed Leo...he's a great actor, and should be recognized as such. Blood Diamond and The Departed are both examples of his acting capabilities (Also, can you say "The Aviator?")...give him both...BB

DiCaprio's on a hell of a run: The Aviator, The Departed, Blood Diamond. He's establishing himself as Hollywood's most dependable (and long-futured) leading man, but it's not quite this 32-year-old's Oscar time - yet.

Whitaker is still on track to win for LAST KING OF SCOTLAND. But speaking of Supporting vs. Lead, there are some who suggest Whitaker's performance should be Supporting, not Lead. I for one think that the logic on that front left the game many years ago, pretty much around the same time studios and their hired Oscar campaign consultants got serious.

I don't understand how Leo was supporting in The Departed, but whatever. It's good to see both of his amazing performances recognized. However, I don't see him having a chance of winning either. I think Eddie Murphy will win the supporting and Forrest Whitaker will win for lead not just at the SAG but Golden Globes and Oscars too. There hasn't been any surprise acting wins in any of those award shows in a while. Poor Leo. I still think the voters think of him as the dreamy guy from Titanic and no matter how many great movies he makes, the voters will always find someone else to vote for. Leo should have won two years ago for The Aviator!

So true

"Why is Leo Screwed -- he got two nominations -- which shows how great he is in both films and I'm glad that he got recognized for both. He should win Best Actor -- he should have won for the "Aviator"

Look forward to cheering for him and "TD" at Oscars

DiCaprio will be nominated for The Departed like Kidman was for Moulin Rouge. Ones a BP contender and one isn't. IMAGINE if Kidman went supporting for Moulin Rouge!

Also look at Actress and Picture-MDB-Swank, DMD-Tandy, SIL-Paltrow

Why is Leo Screwed -- he got two nominations -- which shows how great he is in both films and I'm glad that he got recognized for both. He should win Best Actor -- he should have won for the aviator.

I'm very happy with the nominations, I hope the Oscars duplicate the SAG nomineees -- go Little Miss Sunshine!

I don't understand what all of the confusion is about his status. He is clearly the lead in the movie and everyone knows it. It's only industry politics and the studio haggling to get as many nominations as possible that is causing all of this. He's the lead, period.

Ultimately, he'll get nominated for the Departed (matching Best Pic with Best Actor will make sense to voters when filling out their ballot.) And he'll win on the strength of both his films.

Clooney did it
Penn did it
DiCaprio will do it

Why? Nobody's seen Venus

Yeah it pretty screw up, but I think he has enough and Best Actor is not as loaded up as years past that he should be ok. Quite Frankly Mark is the one left hang out to dry as if The Departed gets two noms in SA now it be for Leo and Jack. Mark I think needed to get both a SAG and Globe to get in.



Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives