The Envelope Logo

Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

National Society of Film Critics votes this Saturday

January 2, 2007 |  3:06 pm

Don't forget to pay serious attention to what those 58 rascal members of the National Society of Film Critics do this Saturday. They're meeting at Sardi's restaurant in New York City to vote on their awards, which should finish up around 4:30 p.m., at which time we'll post the winners' list here. Oftentimes their voting doesn't impact the Oscars because results are kooky ("American Splendor" and "Topsy-Turvy" for best picture) or just come so late in the derby. But sometimes they have surprising oomph in the home stretch. I'm certain that the NSFC played a key role in the surge behind "The Pianist" four years ago. The society definitely put "Annie Hall" on the kudos map back in 1977. Woody Allen's chestnut had been released early that year. In fact, its review in Variety can be found smack-dab in the middle of columns and columns of the tradepaper's Oscar coverage of the previoius derby. No doubt it would've been overlooked by Oscar voters later if the society hadn't revived interest in it at year's end.

"Topsy-Turvy" was also chosen best pic by the New York Film Critics Circle, by the way, which is no small coincidence. The two critics' groups share many of the same members. Yes, the national society does pool input from critics across the U.S., but their votes only count on the initial ballot. If the races get competitive, and they usually do, proxy votes are thrown out after the first round and only members present at Sardi's get to decide the outcome. Member overlap used to be much more extensive than it is now, though.

The comments to this entry are closed.


The only kooky thing here is your "correction," which doesn't correct anything I say in my report. The voting process does pool the input of members who aren't present, but then eliminates those proxy votes after the initial voting. How does your account differ from my account? If you're going to insult me, it's a good idea to have grounds.

A small correction about your NSFC entry: there is no "pooling of input from critics across the US." The majority of the members are now from outside New York City. Everyone who attends the meeting -- which usually includes quite a few out of towners -- votes right through; only those who don't attend and send in proxies (oddly enough, many of the absent ones, including myself this year, are New York residents)drop out after the first round of voting if there is no immediate winner. The results may be kooky, but no less so than your reporting.



In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:

About the Blogger

Pop & Hiss



In Case You Missed It...