Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Forget dangling chads! Emmy election has hubbub over dangling episodes!

June 2, 2007 | 10:02 am

TV academy leaders have just enacted one of the craziest changes ever to Emmy voting — a bizarre accommodation to "dangling" TV episodes . . . and to TV's top hoodlums.

In effect, it's a big smooch and a hard shove forward for two thugs who don't need it: Tony Soprano and Henry VIII.

HBO and Showtime exex made an extra-sneaky sacrifice this year while plotting their grand Emmy strategy. They decided to air the last few episodes of this season's "The Sopranos" and "The Tudors" after the cut-off date for awards eligibility in exchange for having fresh new episodes on TV just when voters are checking off their ballots.

Sopranopullquote_2

Unfortunately, that meant that the big, grand series finale of "The Sopranos" wouldn't be eligible for Emmys, but, hey, HBO chiefs gambled that the tradeoff would be worth it. Ditto for "The Tudors," which arrives just as "Sopranos" takes its final bow.

These after-deadline episodes would not be eligible for ANY Emmys — even next year — under the old Emmy rules.

Here's what the TV academy policy was up until five minutes ago, "If episodes associated with a series are fewer than the minimum number needed to qualify them as a stand-alone series in any given awards year (six for drama and comedy, three for all other series), those 'dangling' episodes are not eligible in any awards year."

"The Sopranos" and "The Tudors" have two episodes "dangling" after the cut-off so they wouldn't qualify for next year.

But, wait, now, ah, things have changed!

On May 16, the academy's Board of Governors voted to permit dangling episodes to compete within the current year.

That means that ATAS just OK'd giving those shows an unfair advantage over competitors. Do you think it's not a big deal?

Think again. In years past, HBO shrewdly marketed "Sex and the City" at the Emmys by launching new seasons precisely at the start of every new voting period — early June. The result was rather confusing to voters. While they watched a new season on TV they were voting on the last one, but such a quibble was just a quibble. "Sex and the City" ended up with gads of nominations (56) and a few top wins, including best comedy series, actress (Sarah Jessica Parker) and supporting actress (Cynthia Nixon).

"It's quite obvious that this is for pro-Sopranos," says our forums poster iskolar.

Other poster Paul Han agrees: "I think this tells you all you need to know about who's going to sweep the drama categories this year. Talk about your all-time two headed coins. Heads 'Sopranos' wins, tails the field loses."

Read more of what our poster think — CLICK HERE!

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Is Tony a real mob guy? I thought he was just an actor. Man, you neva know. You know?

The Wire has certainly been screwed over for years. I am glad to see there are other folks out there feeling the same way. It's too bad that America is missing the great story lines.

I beg to differ with Mack. The story-telling of "The Wire" is it's strength, but it's characters are, IMO, as great an achievement. hey are so fully-realized and motivated in a way those on "The Sopranos" can't even imagine.

"The Sopranos" has always seemed to me to be SO compelling because of the threat of violence that permeates virtually every encounter. But the characters are pretty much the same dude or girl, shallow, willfully ignorant, self absorbed, almost cartoonish in their simplicity.

I honestly don't know how anyone can view the characters in "The Sopranos" as being anywhwre close to the same league as those in :"The Wire."

I do agree wigth Mack that the real shame is that the Emmy's completely invalidate themselves year after year by not even nominating "The Wire."

Hey, Kevin's right. If you love PLOT, PLOT, PLOT, then yes, The Wire is the greatest piece of televised storytelling ever. But if you like to get in-depth with character and am not so concerned with PLOT PLOT PLOT, then The Sopranos is the best. The point is, both shows have different aims and succeed in achieving those aims. They're both superb, but for different reasons, and it's a shame that only one of them gets the Emmy recongnition that they both desserve.

Honestly, "The Sopranos" is a great, great TV show. But it's not anywhere close to being the best show on Television. "The Wire" is heads and shoulders above any show currently on TV including "The Sopranos."

Any of you "Sopranos" fans who think the show is high drama should really take a look at "The Wire." You'll be blown away.

Sounds pretty fair to me.

Hell yes Sopranos! that's the spirit. lets be honest, who cares if The Sopranos is playing unfair. its the greatest show on television. It's gonna sweep (or should sweep) the emmy's regardless.



Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives