Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

'Jesse James' & 'Into the Wild' enter Oscar fray

September 25, 2007 |  6:03 pm

Coming off good buzz from the Toronto Film Festival, both "Into the Wild" and "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" did good biz in their opening weekends in very limited releases. How this will translate into rewards — both monetary and artistic — remains to be seen.

With "Wild," Oscar-winning actor Sean Penn helms his fourth feature. This true tale is based on Jon Krakauer's bestseller about a top student (Emile Hirsch) who leaves school to live in the Alaskan wilderness. The supporting cast includes Oscar winners William Hurt and Marcia Gay Harden as his beleaguered parents.

"Wild," which captured a whopping $53k on each of its four screens, scored a solid 76 at MetaCritic and a healthy 84 at Rotten Tomatoes. While critics were impressed, none of them raved, which could mean that no one will be head cheerleader for the film come award time.

Rolling Stone's Peter Travers thought the film "represents Penn's most assured and affecting work yet as director and screenwriter" and even those less enthused, like A.O. Scott of the New York Times, were still fairly positive. Scott said that, "the film’s imperfection, like its grandeur, arises from a passionate, generous impulse that is as hard to resist as the call of the open road." And Jack Mathews of the New York Daily News lauded the actors. "Hirsch, who lost 40 pounds for the disturbing final scenes, gives a terrific performance, as do Catherine Keener and Brian Dierker, as the middle-aged hippies Chris befriends, and the wonderful Hal Holbrook, playing an old man who wants to adopt him."

The Brad Pitt oater, from Australian director Andrew Dominik, was long delayed but for some the wait was worth it. "Assassination," which hit an impressive $30k per screen, averaged 68 at both MetaCritic and Rotten Tomatoes . However, for this one, critics were divided with one camp offering those all important rhapsodic reviews.

Lisa Schwarzbaum at Entertainment Weekly called the film, "a haunting retelling of one of the enduring outlaw sagas in American culture" while USA Today's Claudia Puig thought it, "a wondrously contemplative and poetic saga that offers a fresh and bewitching take on a timeworn genre."

Then there were the dissenters, such as Kenneth Turan of the L.A. Times who found the film, "hugely ambitious and not without moments of success" and thought, "this indulgent 2 hour and 40 minute epic ends up as unwieldy as its elongated title. It's a movie in love with itself, and few things are more fatal than that." And the New York Post's Lou Lumenick called it "a gorgeous snooze, somewhere between imitation Terrence Malick and a feature version of star Brad Pitt's notorious Vanity Fair layout with Angelina Jolie and their faux kids." Ouch!

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

The movie sounds promising, however are we ever going to see it? When is it slated for a wider distribution?



Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives