Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Prediction: 'Sweeney Todd' will win the Oscar for best picture

October 31, 2007 | 10:55 am

If you've checked out our first Buzzmeter (CLICK HERE, then click on any link to "Individual Panelists' Rankings"), you'll see that I buck the pundit tide and boldly predict that "Sweeney Todd" will win the Oscar for best picture.

No, I haven't seen the film adaptation of the Stephen Sondheim Broadway classic yet, but I have now heard from enough viewers to feel confident that I'm making a shrewd, if recklessly early call. They're all deliriously passionate about it — in fact, they're as mad for it as Sweeney is for his revenge-wreaking razor — and so far it's the only film on the scene to inspire this kind of joy.

Sweeney_best_picture

"Sweeney Todd" does that to people, even though they're actually rooting for a deranged chap to slash men's throats. It's a proven recipe for Oscar victory, tattling on Hollywood's sick dark side. Let's recall that the last musical to win best picture — "Chicago" — also asked viewers to cheer on characters to get away with murder.

But "Sweeney" does it much more deftly in an artistic way. Sondheim's musical score is a masterpiece. By comparison, "Chicago's" score is bad Britney Spears. Viewers can't help but get swept up in "Sweeney's" lush melodies and raging drama, as they're seduced into egging on his quest for vengeance against old Judge Turpin (Alan Rickman) who wrongly sent him to prison in order to steal his wife, then, after she reportedly dies upon swallowing poison, plans to wed and bed Sweeney's lovely young daughter.

I was in New York City in 1979 when "Sweeney Todd" first cast its mad spell on audiences. Broadway went berserk. Media and Manhattan's fancy folk couldn't stop talking about it. Beware: America's moviegoers are about to go through the same mania when they inevitably become smitten with its irresistible bloodlust, artistic brilliance and twisted love tales.

Angela_lansbury

Being a fan of the Rialto production, I had misgivings about this screen adaptation at first. I heard that director Tim Burton cut out lots of its musical score and made it very Sweeney-centric. He significantly trimmed Mrs. Lovett's role — the goofy, love-struck baker who fills her meat pies with his victims because it "seems an awful waste," she sings. "I mean, with the price of meat / what it is/ when you get it / if you get it."

But now I hear that Burton didn't cut out, well, the real meat of her role. She still breaks audiences' hearts even while Sweeney continues to ignore her, which means Helena Bonham Carter is a serious contender for best actress at the Oscars. Her stage predecessor, Angela Lansbury, won the equivalent Tony. The show won eight in all, including best musical, director (Hal Prince), actor (Len Cariou). The only category it lost was lighting.

Thus — since Burton & Co. do not, apparently, screw things up —I think "Sweeney" is a good bet to sweep the Oscars next. Yes, there's the serious issue of Johnny Depp's "singing." He doesn't do it well, but I hear that he sells his feelings with such passionate bravado that he compensates adequately, much like tone-deaf Antonio Banderas managed to pull off — miraculously — in "Evita." When Depp gives up even trying to sing, I hear that he attempts a kind of sing-speak, which worked fine for Oscar- and Tony-winner Rex Harrison in best picture champ "My Fair Lady."

"Sweeney Todd" isn't just any show. Arguably, it's the greatest in Broadway history. All Burton & Co. have to do is not mess up and its dramatic power will carry them to glory.

I believe "Sweeney Todd" will win picture, director and actor. Now it seems clear that Helena Bonham Carter will be nominated for lead actress, but it's unclear yet that she can win. A few months ago Angela Lansbury told me not to worry.

"I think this young woman is very capable of doing something very interesting," she told me about Carter taking over her role as Mrs. Lovett. "Because she's English. She knows London, the East End. I think you'll be surprised. I hope to be able to say that it's going to be good."

To see our video interview, CLICK HERE. Most of her discussion of "Sweeney Todd" is in part two of the video.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

This is one of the only theatrical properties that’s a flat out comedy, dark tragedy and, to top it off a musical. It also has a socio-political subtext that will be very appealing to Oscar voters. I too saw the original Broadway production, as well as several revivals. I can attest to the fact that it is wildly entertaining and challenging at the same time.

I think the key to its success rests with the Hollywood community feeling that Tim Burton has risen to the challenge of successfully transferring this to the screen. Criticism of his work often centers around the notion that the screenplays for his films are lacking and tend to overplay arch whimsy. Obviously Sweeney Todd gives him protection from that argument.

It's interesting that the last musical to sweep the Oscars was West Side Story, a musical with lyrics by Sondheim that also straddled the divisions between comedy and tragedy with a social message. They are strikingly similar in that way, even though they couldn't be more different in tone and subject matter.

If the movie gets favorable reviews and acceptable box-office I could definitely see it sweeping. I really don't think that a lot of the awards pundits are actually aware of exactly how brilliant the material is.

I don't know if your prediction is absolutely brilliant or completely idiotic. However, I think it is a big mistake saying it has a chance to sweep all the top Oscars. That seems really unlikely. I personally I have low expectations for this film. That way if it's good I'll be pleasantly surprised.

And one more thing please stop making the comparison to Rex Harrison and Johnny Depp. I may be wrong, but wasn't Harrison the first choice to play Professor Higgins? And didn't the composers write the songs for Harrison in song-speak (if they didn't, they at least changed the songs to fix his voice)? Futhermore, the song-speak works well for Professor Higgins; it fit the character. I don't think song-speak will work that well in a role that requires a strong voice. If Depp's singing isn't that great, he may end having Audrey Hepburn's luck, not Rex Harrison's.

I've been saying it'll win the big four for months! However, those other films also received the respective screenplay awards as well but nothing more. So Sweeney could end up being the first movie to win the big four and then some (besides screenplay)

Ummm, "tone deaf Antonion Banderas"? Are you aware of the Broadway revival of "Nine" from a few years back? This post is about as dead-on as last year's description of "Dreamgirls" as "a perfect movie."

I have a few friends who have seen the "finished" film and they all thought it was brilliant. An hour and fifty minutes/ 80% - 85% singing...

 


Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives