Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Critics' best-scoring films of 2007: Do Oscars' voters care?

November 11, 2007 |  7:50 am

Ratatouille_oscars

No. Historically speaking, Oscars voters have clearly demonstrated that they don't pay too much mind to what film critics' think, but there isn't a complete disconnect. Last year, for example, three of the Oscars' five nominees for best picture landed in Metacritics' list of the top 20 films of 2006; "The Queen" (91) and "Letters from Iwo Jima" (89) got higher scores than the winner, "The Departed" (86). "Babel" and "Little Miss Sunshine" are missing.

Absent from the previous year's list of top 20 films: Oscars' 2005 best-picture winner "Crash." (See the list here.)

Spotlighting just the movies that are Oscar contenders this year, here's how Metacritic.com scores the titles already released.

96 - "Ratatouille"
94 - "No Country for Old Men"
88 - "Away from Her"
88 - "Once"
85 - "Before the Devil Knows You're Dead"
85 - "The Bourne Ultimatum"
85 - "Knocked Up"
82 - "Michael Clayton"
82 - "Eastern Promises"
82 - "The Namesake"
81 - "Hairspray"

CLICK HERE to See MORE Movies' Scores!

Chicago

80 - "The Simpsons Movie"

79 - "Control"

78 - "Rescue Dawn"

78 - "Zodiac"

76 - "3:10 to Yuma"

76 - "American Gangster"

74 - "Breach"

74 - "A Mighty Heart"

74 - "Sicko"

75 - "Waitress"

73 - "Into the Wild"

72 - "Gone Baby Gone"

71 - "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix"

70 - "The Hoax"

69 - "Lars and the Real Girl"

69 - "Talk to Me"

68 - "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford"

67 - "Darjeeling Limited"

66 - "La Vie en Rose"

65 - "Dan in Real Life"

65 - "In the Valley of Elah"

64 - "Surf's Up"

62 - "Bug"

62 - "Things We Lost in the Fire"

61 - "Meet the Robinsons"

60 - "Lust, Caution"

60 - "Spider-Man 3"

58 - "Shrek the Third"

56 - "The Brave One"

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Great article. I love it!

I don't want to get into the whole BBM vs. Crash argument, but both were excellent films.

I like this article. It is both interesting and revealing. It shows once again that the Academy Awards are pretty much irrelevant and meaningless. Artistic quality, accuracy of subject matter and quality of treatment don’t seem to mean a lot in the final equation in comparison with Hollywood insider politics and the effectiveness of aggressive Oscar campaigns. Their last and perhaps biggest blunder, the crowning of Crash over the exceptional Brokeback Mountain in March 2006, proved it once and for all. I’ve since completely given up on the Oscars. Crash was the worst reviewed film of all nominees and, in the 80 years of Oscar history, it ranks 75th(!) among Best Picture winners when it comes to critics’ ratings (see Rotten Tomatoes). I don’t always agree with all critics (just like everyone), but when there is a strong consensus, it tends to reveal something. Many Oscar winners for BP, including Crash and others mentioned above, do not rank very high in the history of American cinema even if their big win suited Hollywood’s interests.
This being said, it would be nice to see an unpretentious and refreshing film such as Ratatouille get the recognition it deserves when the award season gets started.

SPIDER-MAN 3 got better reviews than THE BRAVE ONE? Christ on a crutch.



Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives