The Envelope Logo

Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Ode to Oscar now the derby is done — What to think?

February 26, 2008 |  1:30 pm

What a derby it was this year! Not only did we Oscarwatchers get to thrill to bizarre awards suspense over whether a quirky masterwork about a coin-tossing grim reaper could take the top prize normally reserved for the safest good movie of the year, but the biggest cliffhanger turned out to be whether Hollywood's biggest show could go on at all.

Double drama! Even better, it all played out like a good thriller with the writers strike ending only days before the Oscarcast after brutally assassinating poor innocents along the way. I happen to know many of the details of an excellent case the Golden Globes have to fire back at WGA with a killer lawsuit that could cost the guild $20 million ("the most slam-dunk case I've seen in years," one lawyer involved with the backstage drama told me), but HFPA, I hear, has decided not to proceed, being good sports and knowing — that's showbiz.

Finale

Then came Oscar night and magic time happened when an obscure actress had her big Cinderella moment, making awards history no less (Marion Cotillard is the first performer to win for a French-speaking role). On stage she gave the performance of her life as she looked out over an audience of reputed Hollywood devils and — wonderstruck, joyous and trembling — gasped, "Thank you, life! Thank you, love! It is true there is some angels in this city!"

Hooray! Even Julie Christie had to cheer that magic moment because, after all, 42 years ago she lived it too. That's why we love the Oscars so. Hollywood is the fantasy capital of the world and when dreams of stardom held precious by struggling souls come true, it's the big payoff for all of the other things Oscar may do wrong.

The essential core of the Cinderella story is how she goes from rags to glory, instantly, and at the Oscars that gets staged like the tap of a magic wand when an envelope gets opened. Like when Hilary Swank won for "Boys Don't Cry" eight years ago and revealed how she went from sleeping in a car with her mom as neophytes in Hollywood to entering the Oscar pantheon at that moment. Being good storytellers, the Coen brothers knew to share with us their own humble back story when they won for directing.

"Ethan and I have been making stories with movie cameras since we were kids," Joel said, recalling how he made one of his earliest amateur films back late 1960s, titled "Henry Kissinger, Man on the Go," starring younger brother Ethan in a suit with a briefcase. "Honestly, what we do now doesn't feel that much different from what we were doing then," he added.

Ah, they're still kids at heart, those rascals, just like the other big kids of Hollywood.

And the Oscarcast itself? Well, just so-so, the live part, but I think there was greatness in the moments that some TV critics are griping about: those clip montages that relived heavenly glimpses of Oscars past. Let's give the academy a break. Writers of this Oscarcast had only eight days to toss this one together, so it was smart of telecast producers to sprinkle it with gems from the vault.

As for Jon Stewart as host, well, he held forth on stage as best he could, managing to avoid disaster. He's a top talent at what he does on "The Daily Show." It's not his fault that he's miscast as host and it would have been ungrateful of him to refuse the academy's offer to helm their party again. Memo to the academy: Next time, please, cast a family member to preside over your clan's reunion.

And as for that little George Clooney prediction of mine, well, let's just pretend it didn't happen since we're discussing events in the world capital of fantasy, OK? Part of my job as an entertainment journalist is to be entertaining while being informative too. That requires me sometimes to dance on the edge, if only to remind you that these upsets can happen, as Daniel Day-Lewis learned five years ago when he was considered a shoo-in for "Gangs of New York" after winning so many precursor prizes. He got upstaged, remember, by a sudden Cinderfella: Adrien Brody.

And while we're on the subject of me fessing up about what I do here at this blog and elsewhere on the derby track, let me explain why I go on and on about "Sweeney Todd" or "Dreamgirls." I don't think it's appropriate to share my own private views about films, not in general. You don't want to hear that. I should stick to reportage about awards. But I don't want to be left out of the rah-rah section. The Oscars are the Super Bowl of showbiz and, in order to have fun and be part of it, we must cheer for our team. Each year I like to pick one film I'm really passionate about and share with you my joy and/or disappointment as it trots ahead, falls back and then tries valiantly to charge on ahead in the derby. Regardless of how it fares, you know what I'm feeling because you feel it too while cheering on your own ponies. Sometimes, when yours trip up, just know that I feel your, pain, too, my fellow Oscar lover.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Comments

Tom, Thanks for all of your observant and interesting posts during this Oscar season!

Yes, Julie Christie did clap wildly at Marion Cotillard's win...She was fishing through her purse during the pause, but had stopped when he called Cotillard's name...(which he said in a whisper,)...and then she jumped wildly in her seat...but if she hadn't, could you blame her?????

Wow, still able to squeeze that Dreamgirls mention in this article Tom after more than a year! Give it a rest okay? Sheesh!

Diane...did I miss something...we're you watching some other clip?...I remember watching Ms. Christie clapping and bouncing in her seat cheering on Marion's victory....she seemed a little distracted at first but she did cheer on Marion and was probably relieved that Marion won instead of her....

Julie Christie did not cheer Marion Cotillard's Cinderella moment cuz she was too busy fishing in her purse for the presumed acceptance speech. Watch the clip and you will find this to be exactly the case.

Enough with this "in the family" terminology. Ugh

Brandon, "everyone" did not think he did a good job or else we're not reading the same reviews. Let me put it to you this way. Last Sunday night did you feel special while you watched, like you were getting a secret glimpse of the family reunion of royal Hollywood? Wondereful family reunions are presided over by a beloved ranking member of the clan who teases and hugs the relatives while playing ringmaster with intimacy, authority and love. Of course not. The family was gathered, but they brought in a rented clown, who did his job tossing off OK jokes, sure, but we were cheated out of the experience the Oscars should be. It wasn't magical, intimate, special. And America didn't tune in because they didn't care too much when they heard the clown was coming. My grudge is NOT against Jon Stewart. He's terrific at what he does. Personally, I think he's fantastic on "Daily Show" and long may he reign! He deserves that. He's aces. And I sure hope he's around on TV 20 years from now, still sticking it to the Powers-That-Be with burning sabers. I cheer him on. He's wonderful at the job he does on cable TV and I'm so happy that he does what he does. Bravo, Jon! My grudge is against the academy for not giving us someone appropriate in the job as Oscar host -- say, Will Smith, Steve Carell, George Clooney, Tom Hanks, Jim Carrey -- someone who is an esteemed, beloved member of the film clan who has heart and wit and a connection to the crowd gathered. And as long as this bunch of presumed movie professionals at the academy keeps getting the casting wrong, I believe it is my job to remind them of what proper casting is. Please STOP thinking that I'm giving the raspberries to Stewart! You're missing the whole point! What he does on the "Daily Show" is terrific, if you judge his perf by other standards. But he failed by THIS standard because he couldn't deliver a job he's not qualified to do. Again, it's not his fault. I'm not blaming Stewart. Do you understand the difference?

Tom, I have a quick question for you too. Since almost everyone thought Jon Stewart was a good host, and better than his last gig, why do you insist on displaying your (at this point) grudge against him? He's not my favorite Oscar host either but geez.


Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:


About the Blogger


Pop & Hiss



Categories


Archives
 



In Case You Missed It...