Jim Parsons of 'Big Bang Theory' is making a big bang on TV, but what about the Emmys?
Jim Parsons is a seriously viable candidate for an Emmy this year. He's not only the breakout star of a hot new comedy, "The Big Bang Theory," he appears on Mike Ausiello's Dream Emmy Ballot over at TVGuide.com
But what is Jim Parsons' best shot — the lead or supporting race? He's chosen lead and I dish both alternatives with him in our podcast chat. (CLICK HERE to Download the MP3 File and Listen — (Note: You may need to hold down your computer's control key while clicking.)
At the Golden Globes, Jim Parsons entered in the supporting category, but he switched to lead at his first Emmys. So I ask him, "Why?"
"Who am I supporting?" he asks in return, which is a good point. He and Johnny Galecki are co-leads of the series about two geeky, physicist roommates who struggle to cope with a crazy world — and with each other. There's an obvious parallel to a classic TV series of yore, "The Odd Couple."
"Definitely," Parsons says. "There's no way around it. I hear that all the time."
And if the parallel holds up, then it's smart that Parsons and Galecki both submitted themselves in lead. Their predecessors Jack Klugman and Tony Randall both won Emmys in lead: Klugman, in fact, won two as the equivalent to Galecki's role (the more grounded, "normal" one) while Randall —l ike Parsons' character ("the persnickety one," he notes) — won only once.
But despite the size of their roles, wacky characters often go supporting, as the persnickety David Hyde Pierce learned on "Frasier," winning four Emmys. Costar Kelsey Grammer won four times in lead, but probably would've beaten Pierce most times if they shared the same category since Grammer's role had more emotional gravitas. That's what voters tend to look for in lead. Winners in supporting tend to be more cartoonish (think of Sean Hayes in "Will & Grace" and Michael Richards in "Seinfeld").
"The more I find out about how the process works the more confused I get," Parsons confesses to Gold Derby. "If somebody doesn't win who I think should win, I don't even know who to blame anymore. It could be their own fault" — because of what race they entered or due to the sample episode they chose to give to judges.
Parsons submitted "The Pancake Batter Anomaly" episode as the one judges will view if he makes the top 10 runoff. "I chose the episode where I'm sick. I thought the whole episode had a real good flow."
And what does he think about the Emmys in general?
"I've been a sucker for them since I was a child," he says. He even recalls, vaguely, the first ceremony that he ever watched on television. " 'The Jeffersons' were nominated," he says. "We had a tiny little TV in the kitchen of my parents' house and I remember seeing Isabel Sanford as one of the best-actress nominees."
Sanford was nominated seven times and won once (1981 — a famous moment when the surprised winner uttered her thank-yous through a mouthful of cheese she had trouble swallowing) between 1979 and 1985. If Parsons is thinking of her first bid, he would've been only 6 years old.
Now that's a serious Emmy geek!
(CLICK HERE to download the MP3 file and listen to our full chat!
(Photo: CBS)




hallow friends i don't know about big bang but i want to know it in detail.
plzz send email to me about it & help me
sachinshinde100@gmail.com
plz
Posted by: sachin | October 15, 2008 at 06:20 AM
I personally think he should have submitted either the pilot of the second episode, which he was excellent in. I agree that he should be in the lead category although if he and Galecki both placed themselves in the supporting categoy, I'd have no problem with that. I just hope that Jim gets that nomination because he is so deserving of at least that type of recognition.
Posted by: I-Rod | May 29, 2008 at 03:37 PM
I'm sorry but Parsons should stick to supporting. He could even easily win supporting but he's never gonna get past the predestined Sheen/Baldwin/Carell/Shaloub/Duchovny nomination in lead.
Posted by: junior | May 29, 2008 at 06:49 AM
Excellent interview! It is great to hear someone actually admit they watch the Emmys and care if they win or not. The way he spent time thinking about the choice of his Emmy episode was also interesting. Good job, Tom.
Posted by: Boomer | May 28, 2008 at 03:45 PM