If Batman's truly gone bad, has Christian Bale doomed his Oscar hopes?
Finally, after an admirable, but low-key career spanning two decades, Christian Bale is the biggest star in the world — at least as measured by having the title role in the most important movie right now: "The Dark Knight." Christian Bale has given Oscar-worthy performances in the past in prestige flicks like "Rescue Dawn" and enjoyed a notable cult following, but he's never been recognized by Oscar voters. No, he won't get nominated for a popcorn pic like "The Dark Knight," but Christian Bale is now such a superstar that he's perfectly positioned, soaring high in his bat cape over filmland, to be noticed by academy voters in the future.
That is, unless Christian Bale may have shot down his award hopes after he was arrested for allegedly assaulting his mum and sister, questioned by London police and released without being charged.
Has Christian Bale just thrown away his Oscar hopes?
Being a bad boy off screen can seriously hurt your shot at winning an Oscar for your on-screen work, however brilliant. Academy Awards are all about bestowing hugs, of course, and nobody wants to embrace a thug.
It's no coincidence that Oscar's two biggest losers — Peter O'Toole (eight defeats) and Richard Burton (seven) — have been Hollywood's biggest hell-raisers.
Or consider Marlon Brando. Early in his career, when he exulted in being a 'tude-heavy dude fond of throwing his fists around Hollywood, he left the Oscar ceremony in 1951 hugely embarrassed — the only cast member of "A Streetcar Named Desire" not to win despite widespread predictions otherwise. Things just got worse after that. Over the next two years Marlon Brando lost best-actor nominations for "Viva Zapata!" and "Julius Caesar."
Then in 1954, desperate to win, he finally wised up, knocked that chip off his shoulder, put on a fancy tuxedo and started acting all sweet and thoughtful at the Golden Globes where he won best actor first, then repeated the feat at the Oscars for "On the Waterfront."
Playing the good guy can be awards bait, but not if you are a bad boy in real life. Consider the backlash against Christian Bale's "3:10 to Yuma" co-star Russell Crowe. Just a few short years ago Crowe was the biggest superstar in the galaxy. When "Gladiator" swept the Academy Awards in 2000, it was all about him, not his movie as academy members welcomed the star of "L.A. Confidential" and "The Insider" into the inner circle of filmmaking like he was a real gladiator triumphantly entering the Hollywood coliseum.
The next year he again joined the Oscar race as the lead star of the eventual best picture winner, "A Beautiful Mind." He was still such a white-hot actor that he coasted through the early derby, easily snagging a best actor trophy from the Golden Globes, Critics' Choice, SAG and — egads — BAFTA. That Brit fest is where the gladiator really threw himself to the lions. He did so by "roughing up," according to the London Sun, a British TV producer for daring to edit down Crowe's rambling recitation of a poem during his acceptance speech. He also threw away his chance to nab an Oscar for "A Beautiful Mind." Instead, Denzel Washington claimed the prize for "Training Day."
Two years later, Crowe proved he was still a commanding screen star, although no longer the ruler of his domain. He landed the lead role in "Master and Commander," an epic, high seas blockbuster that cost $150 million to make. While it earned only $93 million at the U.S. box office, it was a hit with Oscar voters, reaping a whopping 10 nominations, including best picture, but — ominously — no acting bid for the movie's master and commander: Crowe. It ended up winning only two Academy Awards, both in tech categories.
More disaster followed for Crowe with his next project, "Cinderella Man." This 2005 biopic helmed by Ron Howard looked like perfect Oscar fare: a well-crafted, feel-good tearjerker starring Crowe as a down-on-his-luck boxing hero. Reviews and buzz were excellent when it opened but soon thereafter Crowe pulled his biggest blunder yet. Allegedly drunk and unhinged in the middle of the night, he got mad when he had trouble dialing his hotel phone in Manhattan, yanked it out of the wall, marched down to the lobby and hurled it at an innocent hotel clerk. The clerk struck back by filing criminal charges.
Unfortunately for Crowe, the whole incident had been caught on videotape by a security camera. This time he wasn't bullying another media pro he had a quarrel with. Or it wasn't like this hotel clerk was a pesky paparazzo (like the kind that Sean Penn went after). He was an honest, hard-working, innocent Everyman, a regular Joe, just the kind of guy who probably spends a chunk of his paycheck to see Russell Crowe movies. Produced for $88 million, "Cinderella Man" ended up earning only $61 million domestically.
While voters for the Screen Actors' Guild and Golden Globes thought his performance in "Cinderella Man" was good enough to merit a best actor bid, Crowe was snubbed by the Academy Awards. And for his acclaimed 2007 roles in "3:10 to Yuma" and "American Gangster" he had to make do with a pair of SAG ensemble nominations.
Christian Bale has never had a hooligan reputation like Russell Crowe. That may help him to be easily forgiven now, if this current mess plays out OK.
Christian Bale certainly deserves another chance to be reconsidered for his excellent screen work. While the actor has denied that such an assault took place in London Sunday just hours before the premiere of the highly anticipated sequel to "Batman Begins," the damage to Bale's reputation may be irreparable. Though Christian Bale earned critical acclaim for transforming himself physically for roles in edgy films like "American Psycho" and "The Machinist," he never broke into the mainstream until taking on the iconic role of Batman in 2005. Since then, Bale has appeared in a range of big budget movies with varying degrees of success.
Though the historical epic "The New World" and the Victorian adventure "The Prestige" failed to impress, his performances last year in a trio of very different roles showcased his abilities. Whether as the real life Vietnam hero in "Rescue Dawn," one of six different incarnations of Bob Dylan in "I'm Not There," or the innocent rancher caught in the crossfire in "3:10 to Yuma," Bale showed Hollywood he had the right stuff. He recently wrapped "Public Enemies" playing the do-gooder who hunts down John Dillinger (Johnny Depp) and is filming the long awaited sequel "Terminator Salvation" stepping into the shoes of John Connor, the only hope for man against machine. And he is said to be considering the role of Robin Hood in "Nottingham."
(Warner Bros.)




Bale is highly overrated as an actor. Ever since American Psycho, he's been delivering the same Kenneth Branagh-like lockjaw American accent. Dark Knight has made him popular with fanboys, but he has yet to open a movie on his own name, and he has yet to win an acting awards - indie or mainstream. Time to pass on bad behavior. There are hundreds of young actors waiting for a chance. BTW, for the rabid fan(s) who don't think Bale's an asshole, at least Superman never hit Martha Kent! ;)
Posted by: Helena Candareli | July 23, 2008 at 08:14 AM
Ok, first of all to call The Dark Knight a "popcorn pic" and to say Bale wouldn't even be considered for an Oscar for his performance is just asinine. The Dark Knight is recognized by most reviewers as one of the best films made to date. And second, to say the Prestige didn't impress, well thats a whole other story all together. The Prestige probably did not impress you, because judgeing from this poor, poor attempt at journalism, you most likely have a very bland taste in film. If you think The Dark Knight was just some silly movie to sell toys, please, please enlighten all of us as to what kind of film you enjoy....
Posted by: Are You Serious | July 23, 2008 at 07:51 AM
This is truly one of the goofiest, most inane articles about Oscars and awards --and the reason people don't get nominated or win that I've ever read...O'Neil, you are really reaching on this one. Total BS.
Posted by: Roger | July 23, 2008 at 06:39 AM
I have a relative who has a trigger temper and a propensity toward verbal abuse, which leads to physical intimidation. Perhaps he's done this before, and this was the final time. Good for them if he used either tactic. No one deserves that kind of treatment.
Posted by: calid | July 23, 2008 at 06:11 AM
OH MY GOD, It's Russell Crowe, blah blah blah. Why do you go choke on some pig vomit ya sods!
Don't interrupt my poetry ya testicle!
Makin Movies, Makin Songs, and Fightin Round The World!
Posted by: Russell Crowe | July 23, 2008 at 06:08 AM
As already mentioned this was a terrible attempt at journalism, please stop this gossip shop crap.
Posted by: Toby | July 23, 2008 at 05:33 AM
This is so stupid. He allegedly VERBALLY assaulted his mother and sister. That is hardly the same thing. As for his accent, he grew up in the States.
Posted by: Vanessa | July 23, 2008 at 05:07 AM
Penis envy, much, Mr. O'Neill, of two of the best actors in the world? They are way up there, while you are just a pathetic hack talking out of your ass. And your love/hate for Russell has really become pathetic.
Posted by: Zhora | July 23, 2008 at 03:44 AM
@Manjit
Bale always does interviews in the SAME accent as his roles (so as not to confuse people.. go read his bio in imdb).
His role in Batman happens to be an American (c'mon!) and his accent is not much different than his other "American" accents.
What's with the Bale-bashing?
He's a wonderful actor - all the way even before Batman Begins
Posted by: sky | July 23, 2008 at 02:10 AM
Russell Crowe gave a "rambling recitation" of a 4-LINE POEM at the 2002 BAFTAs? What ARE you on about, Mr. O'Neil? Mr. Crowe "denied" the confrontation took place? Again, you are completely off. He "refused to apologize"? What have you been smoking, sir?
I will be charitable and call your statements mere gross exaggerations. But you and I know what they really are, don't we?
Posted by: mjkbk | July 22, 2008 at 09:45 PM
Tom,
You're a douche.
Posted by: Vic Arpeggio | July 22, 2008 at 09:26 PM
Tool O'Neil just went TMZ on Christian Bale and Russell Crowe. Way to throw your shred of credibility out the window, blogger.
Posted by: Patrick Bateman | July 22, 2008 at 09:08 PM
Tom, you actually beat me to this. I was going to post this exact issue on TDK thread.
Unfortunately, we may never know exactly what occured between Bale and his family on Sunday night. And that will always stay with Bale throughout his career now, regardless if his future performances are stellar or not.
I could only hope that The Academy would look past this, but sadly, I don't think they can. I still think that IMO that TDK should be nominated for Best Picture, but this incident might have hinder their chances.
Posted by: caresa | July 22, 2008 at 08:59 PM
Tom, you're way off course in this grandiose speculation of this case. Christian Bale is a hard working actor who takes his work very seriously. I reckon that if anything, harsh language and/or brushing against someone to get away from them is what Christian was called down to the police station for. What decent mother and sister would file charges against their son/brother on the day of his most important movie premiere? Mean hags who are angry at him for not tossing more money their way, that's who. Vindictive and ignorant family can be a person's worse enemy. I hope for Christian's sake, the police drop the investigation so that he can clear his name and move on, sans mummy and sis. They can kiss their meal ticket good bye forever!
Posted by: Go_blue | July 22, 2008 at 08:11 PM
The only a**hole here is you Tom. Who cares about the gossip about two great film actors. The fact is they are both great actors. And you just can't help finding any reason to critize Crowe any chance you get.
Posted by: James | July 22, 2008 at 08:09 PM
Who wrote this drivel? You really make some pretty far-fetched assumptions about movie-goers and oscar-voters being influenced by tabloid-level gossip - maybe to try to justify writing such a sleazy article in the first place? Get this garbage out of the Times, please.
Posted by: jghedge | July 22, 2008 at 07:42 PM
The difference between Bale and Crowe, is that Crowe is an asshole, Bale isn't.
The points about Polanski are apt....Hollywood has no morals except Greed, Sex, and Drugs are good things.
Posted by: Moog | July 22, 2008 at 05:28 PM
This is so typical of the irresponsible junk typical of sleazy gossip sites. Take an allegation that has in no way been detailed, let alone proven, and use it as the opportunity to start a mindless frenzy of speculation. To maintain the semblance of fair play, you write the article with qualifiers like "may" and "allegedly." I'm sure the LA Time's lawyers are happy. Then, after you've devoted paragraphs and pargraphs of dragging Bale's reputation through the mud by comparing him to other actors who have undeniably been convicted of crimes or publicly admitted to wrongdoings, end the article with a self-serving, pious declaration that "Bale certainly deserves another chance to be reconsidered for his excellent screen work." What a disgusting hack piece of journalism.
Posted by: Peter Lee | July 22, 2008 at 05:24 PM
Christian Bale is the finest screen actor working at this time. Whether he gets a nomination for "Dark Knight" or not doesn't change that fact.
Posted by: JJ Flash | July 22, 2008 at 04:51 PM
I agree with "JD" above. This isn't a news article, it's a mindless rant. Leave Russell Crowe and Christian Bale alone. Crowe has gotten more than his share of bad raps from the press and now, unfortunately, it looks like that could happen for Bale, too. These two guys are actors. Judge them by their performances, not what goes on offscreen.
Posted by: Layne | July 22, 2008 at 04:35 PM
As a person with a full career in film and television, degrees, etc I have to say: This is the most ridiculous article I have ever read. And it has nothing to do with Bale's actions, but rather your terrible, terrible assessment of film in general and the way this industry works. Rescue Dawn was Oscar worthy? You don't understand the way this business and art works, do you? I will bet 1 million dollars of my own money that you did not even watch that film. Did you? Be honest. I could go on, but I won't. Someone please remove this article and ban this person from ever writing anything ever again for lack of experience.
Posted by: John Smith | July 22, 2008 at 04:27 PM
You make no valid points. This article is a mindless rant. Oh yeah but when a guy like Roman Polanski rapes a 13 year old girl Hollywood still showers him with roses and kisses and gives him an oscar. Common. Hollywood dosen't care it has no morals anyway.
Posted by: JD | July 22, 2008 at 03:32 PM
One little incident doesn't make him a BAD guy! Besides...nobody is perfect.
Independantly on whether he's BAD or not...
Christian Bale is an AMAZING actor!!! He has a GREAT future awaiting him and will no doubt, will recieve many nominations and awards!
Posted by: kayla | July 22, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Christian Bale didn't Christian Bale doomed his Oscar hopes, because there were never an Oscar hope for him - at least, not for "Batman".
Posted by: Kamila | July 22, 2008 at 03:16 PM
I don't think this will doom any oscar chances he gets. I mean, look at Roman Polanski, the man left serious sex charges behind him to flea to another country, and ended up getting oscar noms. In Bale's case, it looks like a minor incident that will resolve itself.
Posted by: Manjit | July 22, 2008 at 03:13 PM