Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

Re-release of 'The Dark Knight' will give Heath Ledger an Oscar push

September 12, 2008 | 11:00 am

"Batman wants an Oscar," reports the Hollywood Reporter. "To be precise, Warner Bros. wants a statuette — or 10 — for 'The Dark Knight.' So the studio plans to re-release its blockbuster Batman sequel in January, the height of Academy Awards voting season.

"It's just a matter of bringing it back as a reminder for people," according to the trade paper.

"The Dark Knight" will be re-released to Imax theaters at the peak of derby season —January — but it's unclear if the flick will be also be shown again on regular screens. So far "The Dark Knight" has grossed more than $55 million at Imax venues and $512 million domestically, making it the second-highest-grossing film ever, after "Titanic," which grossed $600 million ($1.24 billion worldwide in 1997 and 1998) and tied the record for most Oscars (11) set by "Ben-Hur" in 1959. The DVD of "The Dark Knight" will be released in December.

Heath_ledger_the_dark_knight_oscars

Chief among the 10 Oscar categories that Warner Bros. aims for is supporting actor for Heath Ledger, of course, but beware: Only one star has won an Oscar from the grave (Peter Finch, "Network"), and roles like the Joker are rarely even nominated.

Maybe this next Oscar factoid may help put things in clearer perspective. After the beloved Spencer Tracy died in 1967 after giving a dynamic, heartfelt performance in best picture nominee "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner," he was widely expected to win best actor, but he lost to Rod Steiger ("In the Heat of the Night"). However, Tracy's de facto widow, Katharine Hepburn, won for lead actress for a rather tame turn with little screen time in "Dinner."

Bottom line: Oscar voters wanted to bestow a hug after losing Tracy, yes — but they just didn't want to hug the dead guy.

When Peter Finch passed away, the situation was very different from Tracy's and Ledger's. The latter stars died more than six months before the Oscarcast. Finch died of a heart attack just two weeks before the Golden Globes while he was actively campaigning to stop that juggernaut Robert De Niro ("Taxi Driver"), who'd swept the film critics' awards. Oscar and Globe voters were still stunned by Finch's loss when they inked their ballots, and they couldn't resist checking off his name.

Heath Ledger bears a striking similarity to James Dean. Both were heartthrob thespians whose promising careers were cut short by tragedy.  Dean had two posthumous Oscar nominations. The first — for "East of Eden" — came nearly half a year after Dean died in a car wreck. The next year he was nommed for "Giant," and he lost both times. (NOTE: I originally wrote that "Giant" was Dean's first posthumous nomination. I have changed the post to read correctly.)

When Oscar nominations come out in January, Heath Ledger will have been dead a year. Given all of the Oscar hubbub he's generating now, I'm sure he'll be on that list of contenders, but can he really win?

Oscar voters aren't wild about campy villain roles in popcorn flicks like "Dark Knight." The only time one got nominated was Al Pacino as Big Boy Caprice in "Dick Tracy" (1990). Jack Nicholson's widely celebrated Joker in "Batman" (1989) — the same role now played by Heath Ledger — was nominated for a Golden Globe but not an Oscar, which is odd considering how nuts academy members are for Jack. (Nicholson holds the records for most nominations and wins among male actors.)

And Oscar voters don't usually like villainous roles unless the actor rides to victory atop a best-picture sweep, like Anthony Hopkins in "The Silence of the Lambs."

KEEP READING - CLICK HERE!

But — wait — that trend may be changing. Just this past year we saw the trophies for best actor and supporting actor go to stars portraying bloodthirsty monsters: Daniel Day-Lewis and Javier Bardem.

And maybe the whole world, even Hollywood, is different today than it was when those other posthumous Oscar examples occurred. If so, then maybe this Joker can get the last laugh. Especially if he holds an ole Oscar IOU from academy members. Does he? (READ MORE, CLICK HERE ). If he does have a serious hope of prevailing, then in which category should he be entered, lead or supporting? Read more about that great debate — CLICK HERE!

(Warner Bros., United Artists, Columbia Pictures)

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

What about BRAD RENFRO'S ENTIRE film career AND LIFE ARE OVER SHADOWED BY HEATH'S GHOST.....ABOUT MORE FOR BRAD!!

Bradley Barron Renfro (July 25, 1982 – January 15, 2008), billed as Brad Renfro, was an American actor. He made his film debut in 1994 in the title role of The Client. He acted in 21 films, several short films, and one television episode during his career. Much of his later career was marred by a pattern of substance abuse. He died January 15, 2008 from an overdose of heroin.

Heath Ledger realmente lo hizo genial! Se merece el Oscar Póstumo! realizó su papel con tanta naturalidad como si él mismo hubiese escrito el libreto! Desde un punto de vista psicológico, se puede apreciar mejor su desenvolvimiento en su papel psicópata. Realmente EXCELENTE!!!

I think Warner Bros should re-release The Dark Knight in all theaters. And no Gyllenhel should not be replaced, again, by Katie Holmes. I think Gyllenhaal performed smashingly. And I would not want it either way.

I miss Heath Ledger!! He should gain an Oscar because in all respect he outperformed more than Anthony Hopkins did in Silence of The Lambs.

So KEITH should shut up about his philosophy of an actress.

And Heath Rocked in The Dark Knight!!

I think that the re-release of the movie should have Katie Holmes replacing Maggie Gyllenhaal, if possible. (nothing personal Maggie) In my opinion that is the only flaw in the movie (a big one in my eyes). It looses that realism and its hard to believe. Im not her biggest fan nor do I think shes the greatest actress, but movie sequals need the original cast. Plus the death scene would of been more shocking. If they make a 3rd installment it could of gone down as the best trilogy of all time, next to star wars, but that replacment kills it, what if star wars replaced princess Lea in The Empire Strikes Back? or Rocky fought a different Apollo in Rocky II? It would have been weird huh? Thats why I think it should be done.

CREO QUE HEATH SE MERECE ESTE OSCAR, NO SOLO POR SU ACTUACION COMO EL JOKER, SINO TAMBIEN POR SU INTENSA CARRERA QUE QUEDARA EN NUESTRA MEMORIA Y NUESTROS CORAZONES.
DESCANSA EN PAZ ANGEL

"Hey zaviarwun,
Jack Nicholson is far greater than Heath Ledger, Heath just changed the Joker into an ordinary people. But Heath Ledger really deserve it for his great performance."
I storngly disagree there, Heath had such a wide range, as does jack, but the reason why everyone was so upset was because they knew he could give more in terms of his talent.
I'd say in my own personal opinion he could've been as great as Nicholson if given the chance, and plus he was only 28. Nicholsons had his whole life.

Hey zaviarwun,
Jack Nicholson is far greater than Heath Ledger, Heath just changed the Joker into an ordinary people. But Heath Ledger really deserve it for his great performance.

Heath Ledger's performance campy? More like terrifying. either you have not seen the film (and if so should not be discussing it) or need to stop confusing Heath with Jack Nicholson.

This joker is not "campy" at all...Jack Nicholsons was campy, and this film isnt just a popcorn flick either, its an intense, deep and clever saga, Heath and the film deserve to win for this.

Lets be honest though, Heather Ledger gave one of the best performances ever. Actor, Actress, Lead, Supporting, or Cameo.

You have it backwards with James Dean's posthumous Oscar noms. In 1955, he was nommed for East of Eden (his first starring role ever) and his 2nd Oscar nom came in 1956 for Giant.

Of course, it's ironic that out of his three films, the only role that he did NOT receive an Oscar nom for was his iconic turn in "Rebel Without A Cause."



Stay Connected:


Advertisement

About the Blogger


The Dish Rag
Pop & Hiss
Notes on a Season
The Circuit: Awards and Festivals News



Categories


Archives