Bill Maher vs. Jesus Christ in 'Religulous' -- who wins?
"Religion is the easiest thing to sell because it's an invisible product," "Religuous" star Bill Maher tells Gold Derby in this video chat. "Which, by the way, you can't test it out until after you die. So no one's there to complain after you drive this thing off the lot and it breaks down — because you're dead. So what salesman doesn't want a piece of that territory?"
Maher and director Larry Charles take on quite a few of those dubious salesmen of religious beliefs in their sacrilegious documentary now in theaters. Because it's made by such notable showbiz folks, I ask Bill Maher, "Doesn't this documentary epitomize godless Hollywood in a way?"
"I hope!" he roars. "If I have anything to do with it it will."
"How many people at award shows do you see thanking God?" pipes in Larry Charles. "Hollywood is also using God for its own purposes as well."
"Religious people look at me as you might look upon a retarded child," Bill Maher adds, quoting them, "'He's unenlightened. He needs to be saved. He needs to be cured.' I respect all human beings and I would like them to see my version of enlightenment. And mostly I want them to laugh."
Reviews have been quite good from top media. Variety hails "Religulous" as "brilliant, incendiary," while Entertainment Weekly adds, "It's a film that's destined to make a lot of people mad, but Maher, for all his showy atheistic 'doubt,' isn't just trying to crucify religion — he truly wants to know what makes it tick. He leaves no stone tablet unturned." Other raves come from the New York Times, USA Today, Hollywood Reporter and from Roger Ebert at the Chicago Sun-Times. Among the pans is the Washington Post.
If you'd like to pursue the questions raised by "Religulous" further, I recommend reading this interesting article at Atheists.org, which builds the case for the assertion that there's no credible evidence that Jesus Christ existed. Uncontested is the fact that no one alive during the time Jesus is said to have lived wrote about him, which is strange considering that there are plenty of historic accounts of other messiah figures of the era. The first two mentions of him don't come till more than a half century after the date given for Jesus' execution, and the authenticity of those texts by Josephus in AD 93 and Tacitus in 120 are questioned by many secular scholars. Read more.
To read Gold Derby's take on Religulous' run for the Oscar, click here.
spa










I don't know anything about group psychology, but I go to my brother-in-law's church with my wife and for some strange reason some people stick a hand in the air while singing. Some use two arms, is this some sort of Jesus antenna. Do you they get stronger spiritual reception? Or is it merely a PDA for Jesus so you can look good to your fellow followers?
Every time I see that it makes me laugh. Who started that business?
Posted by: d f | April 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Bill Maher....
You have questions... I have the answers. All you have to do mis ask.
Posted by: Randell Van Alst | October 07, 2009 at 11:04 AM
thumbs up to bill maher. He's got quite a point and argues that point effectively. I like his description of religion at the end as an invisible product, that cannot be complained about because that is of course blasphemy, and can't be tested. Great way to put it.
Posted by: Derek | June 12, 2009 at 11:54 AM
I believe sometimes that I am God. I have seen burning bushes and copped a pretty good buzz on 3 year old virgin blood. If you will worship me I will happily pass you the plate. Your donations will be appreciated, hallelujah brothers and sisters. Are there any belly-dancers out there looking for work?
Posted by: David Willis | May 28, 2009 at 11:06 AM
So does Bill seek to expose Islam in this movie too? Why is it always "vs. Jesus" when there are supposedly more Muslims on the planet? I haven't seen it, I'm just asking.
It just seems like Christianity and/or Judaism are always the religions attacked because they have belief systems based partly or entirely on the Bible.
Posted by: anon | March 01, 2009 at 11:11 PM
Remember 9/11?
That religion shore is purty.
Posted by: Pluto Animus | October 14, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Disproving religion is like beating a Wookie in chess, the loser may rip your arm out of its socket.
Posted by: rick | October 14, 2008 at 01:59 PM
Christians are so sensitive.
I would have more respect for them if they followed their own God.
Jesus told them to shut themselves up in a closet to pray and that public displays of religion were evidence of a lack of faith.
Jesus taught that it would be easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Yet Christians overwhelmingly honor rich professing Christians as evidence of the favor of God.
Look in the mirror if you want respect.
Posted by: Johnnyb93 | October 13, 2008 at 04:36 AM
If we put each religion in a courtroom, what evidence would prove they were true beyond a doubt?
Posted by: Smug | October 12, 2008 at 09:37 PM
Dear Bill,
I watch your TV show pretty regularly. I like the portion of the show where you interview or have open dialogue with your guests.
You're a smart guy and most of your guests are too.
I saw Religulous on Friday afternoon. I've been a born again Christian for 45 years but I am more a liberal than a conservative.
It's too bad you set out to ridicule Christians, because I believe that if you had gone in search of the truth with an open mind and heart it would have found you.
Among other things I believe every woman is entitled to make her own decisions regarding her body, though I personally could never have an abortion. I believe that gay people are born gay and should have the same rights as heterosexuals. In fact, most of the Gay people I know are better human beings than those who disagree.
I believe that we all are responsible for our own actions, what ever we believe. It's too bad you chose to seek out the Christian "fringe" or "radicals". Except for the truckers. They actually represent most Christians as they worship privately and don't choose to make a big public show of their religion. Jesus admonished us from praying on street corners so as to draw attention to ourselves, but said rather that we should pray in our closet, that our prayers be between us and our Lord.
If you really want the truth about Our Lord, talk to credible people. Billy Graham and Chuck Smith are the 2 most well known Christians who have never sought fame and fortune in the name of God.
God Bless You and may a miracle come into your life that you may know the truth.
Marcia Willis
Posted by: Marcia W | October 12, 2008 at 03:05 PM
Craig Hazen, an evangelical comparative religion professor at Biola University reviews "religulous."
"Maher is pitching this film as mavericky—telling the truth about religion that everyone else is afraid to address. But Religulous is nothing more than filthy, nudie, druggie, and obtusey. There is little to laugh at and nothing to learn (except maybe that if you quit being religulous you get to act like Caligulous)."
http://www.biola.edu/news/articles/2008/081007_hazen.cfm
Posted by: JF | October 09, 2008 at 03:31 PM
"So what salesman doesn't want a piece of that territory?" (Maher). The quote refers to a religious follower trying to "sell" a religion to another. The "salesman" terminology is a faulty one, at least with regard to true Biblcial Christianity. Christians believe in telling others about God, evil, judgment, and salvation through Jesus Christ the Lord, not based on opinion, but as based on the eternal source of the Bible. It is a category mistake to compare Biblical evangelization to sales. In sales, to be blunt, the representative is trying to get something out of the customer, namely, a sale and commission. However, the Christian tells the message, not to gain from the other person, but to give to the other person. It is for the other person's well-being ("profit"). You may disagree with the Christian message, but the Biblical motivation is self-sacrificing for the good of the other, not the mentality of personal gain.
Posted by: Grace to you. | October 09, 2008 at 10:49 AM
"You can't test it [religion] out until after you die. So no one's there to complain after you drive this thing off the lot and it breaks down — because you're dead" (Maher). Religion and philosophy can be tested by logic. If a belief-system is "ridiculous" in the sense that it is illocial and contradictory, then it should be rendered absurd. No teacher would allow a student to say A equals B and therefore I was write when I spelled bpple. It doesn't and therefore it would be dismissed. It wouldn't be right for the teacher to say, "Well, if you really believe A equals B then it's okay and who am I to object and try to help you; it is right in your own world." Surely, the teacher needs to be kind and patient but he/she does need to try to help the child.
As for complaining but no body is there to complain to, we need to realize that ultimately, each one is responsible for his own choices, beliefs, and actions. That's not to say enviromental factors don't influence us, but even still, ultimately I'm at fault if I get my own belief-system wrong. The only complaint is against myself. For instance, a below-average school is responsible for the education of its students. However, each family and student is ultimately responsible for the student's education. The student can't sit idle and blame the school. Employers aren't going to excuse a would-be worker for incompetence that is blamed on the schooling system. No, the would-be worker must assume responsiblity and "get it right." We are responsible for our own beleifs, especially to test them the best we can, and it's not mostly your fault if I don't test them and/or get them wrong.
Posted by: Grace to you. | October 09, 2008 at 10:43 AM
"Religion is the easiest thing to sell because it's an invisible product" (Maher). Commercials and ads always try to put products on display. Basic marketing realizes that unless the people "see" the product, it'll never sell. But according to him, an "invisible product" is not only easy, but the easiest thing to get people to "buy." I have an "invisible" elf for sale for only $100. First come, first serve! But you all know better than that.
By the way, religion is not "invisible." With each religion or philosophy, there are doctrines and claims to evaluate and test according to reason. Something can't be true if it is illogical/non-sense (A cannot equal B). Some religions can't be true because they are contradictory in their own fundamental tenents. Furthermore, as a secondary evidence, evaluating the adherents of a movement can also make religion visible. Surely, fanatical, illegal, and inhumane behavior discredits certain religious systems. On the other hand, one's love, joy, peace, and wisdom can be powerfully persuasive.
Posted by: Grace to you. | October 09, 2008 at 10:41 AM
The definition of atheism is "the doctrine or belief that there is no God". I don't think that is what Bill is trying to show. He isn't saying there isn't a God. He's saying that he doesn't know and that anyone who claims to know without a doubt about the existance of God is wrong. These people with absolute knowledge of God are the same ones that create self serving institutions that preach stories and testaments that were made up in an effort to take advantage of the human desire to believe that there is something more to life then what we have on this earth. It is fear of our mortality and horrible life experiences that allow otherwise reasonable and smart people to turn to these institutions. Take a step back and look at the creative and fantastic stories that come from organized religion and the only reasonable conclusion is that it is fictitious and detrimental.
Posted by: RGam | October 07, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Hello people?! Religion is the number one cause of homicide in the world. ya go on and keep supporting this killer... at least the younger generations are seeing the light, they are finally thinking outside the box and realizing all this religion is bs, just look at any religion and there you will find bs. But don't take my word for it, go and donate 10% or your income or whatever, everyone else is doing it.
Posted by: Hello people?! | October 07, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Finally a movie that speaks out, too many people get offended when you show them facts showing religion is false. Religion is just a different type of corporation, that isn't viewed as one because it's from a "higher power" notice no one could give him any reason/facts to support any religion. I mean hell the christian religion is a rewritten version of the egyptian religion from (approx) 1320 bc. In which the son of GOD osiris is born on dec 25 from a virgin mother, has 12 diciples, is crucified, ressurected 3 days later, etc. Did you know the Roman Catholic Church is the largest property owner in the world? I think the biggest thing is fear. People fear that they have to believe in GOD in case there is one. And with all these religions going door to door selling their product. I understand why alot of people are blind. I mean if any company advertises a product and shows people using it enough, people will accept it as a good product. It's commercial propaganda. Let me tell you about my best friend... jesus christ... hahahahaha i love hearing that.
Posted by: Intelligent | October 07, 2008 at 10:44 AM
Really guys, unless you believe in God, Mohammad, Buddha, and venomous snake saviors, at the same time, then you are all Atheists in another's eyes...
As for the "why would Peter, etc etc die for Christ" comment.. that my friend is the base and biggest problem I have with religion... asserting that those events took place, and then expecting the world to return to you some sort of automatic respect for believing that they did. Prove first that it happened, then ask the questions.
Posted by: David Brown | October 07, 2008 at 10:27 AM
I feel so sad for Mr.Maher and so many who have commented on this movie.
3 scriptures come to mind ;
1. Rom 1:28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.
2.Psa 14:1 The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good.
3. Rom 1:22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools,
We love you all and will be praying for you !
Posted by: Robert Evans UK | October 07, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Maher is just an arrogant vinegar and water mixing bag. He has been trying for years to get any type of respect since starring in the best movie of his "career", "Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death".
Posted by: Lowblojoe | October 07, 2008 at 08:21 AM
Eric,
Religious, mentally ill, and people who are developmentally disabled are the same?
Are you insentive or what.
People who are metally ill or have special needs are not the same as people who are religious.
What an insult. People with mental illness and special needs can not help who they are.
I sure hope you or your family do not develop a mental illness or have a child with special needs because then you will know what it is like to have ignorant people like yourself and Bill ridicule you at every turn.
I don't bash astheists but I certain don't think that line of thinking is provides any type of hope at all.
You live , you die. Oh well and do the best you can in between.
That just doesn't cut it for most of the world. I don't think wanting to believe in something higher than our selves, makes people, stupid or moronic or that it is a crutch. Most people of faith live peacefully in society and desire and do wonderful acts of compassion and grace. Certainly, many non believers do the same however do not focus on the small percentage of extermists who ruin it for the rest of us. That goes for extermists in all areas.
Bill Maher makes his living mocking others as do many comedians, I just think people need to be careful of holding too much weight on his put downs and opinions.
Have a wonderful day everyone and God Bless.
Posted by: Ruth | October 07, 2008 at 07:41 AM
[quote]
he wants whether they are religious, mentally ill, developmentally handicapped etc.
[/quote]
Those are the same people...
I think the movie is great.
Anyone here bashing atheists... please think for a moment... it would be like bashing non-stamp collectors for their beliefs... its a weird group to bash. The absence of belief is not a belief system.
I as an Atheist have the strength to understand that I should do what is right without needing to fear any supernatural punishment. And by right I understand the evolution of different facets of that position. The tit for tat experiment can prove some of that for you. But don't lump all non-stamp collectors together. They all come to their own moral code with their own beliefs. Not all strive to be the best. Don't worry tho... I won't lump all religious people together with Hitler... since he wasn't using your book to promote his ideals... but I guess I could lump christians with the south and their belief in slaves being morally justified since the book says there isn't anything wrong with it.
Enjoy,
Eric
Posted by: Eric | October 06, 2008 at 02:56 PM
I hope Maher's next movie "lampoons" the Muslim Prophet.
Posted by: Joel | October 06, 2008 at 01:33 PM
Why would Paul, Peter, others, etc. allow themselves to be crucified, persecuted for someone who did not exist? Were all of Christ's followers crazy?
The answer is yes! They were crazy! Just like the Muslims who flew planes into the world trade center. Would somebody do that if the 72 virgins didn't exist?
Posted by: Dennis | October 06, 2008 at 01:19 PM
There are to many times when we can look at something and say that is impossible, how? Then, there are so many times that some guy went out into the wilderness, during troubled times for their people, and came back with a lot of self serving "words from God."
To say with absolute conviction that "God" did not alter man physically with Adam and Eve and mentally with Jesus is not really possible. Look at the progress of man in the last 2,000 years as apposed to that prior. Whether, God is a being from another planet or a god is debatable, however, man was altered 4,000 years ago and again 2,000 years ago.
Though, the Bible has been altered from it's original, which is a man made product (like marriage), the intelligence and the absolute fantastic stories, parables and metaphors make it hard to believe man did not have a friend, teacher, visitor or someone more evolved involved.
Posted by: Edith Ann | October 06, 2008 at 01:15 PM