Heath Ledger's family plans to take his Oscar, which should go to Matilda if he wins!
Yesterday, when Heath Ledger's family landed at LAX airport to begin their march to the podium to pick up his inevitable supporting-actor Oscar for "The Dark Knight" this Sunday, a reporter asked Ledger's dad if Heath's daughter Matilda will get the statuette. Kim Ledger replied — shockingly — "Oh, yeah, down the line. We'll keep it for her forever!" You can see the video on TMZ.com.
Huh? The award belongs to Matilda. The academy requires that posthumously bestowed Oscars go to the late person's spouse or a child of legal age. The only reason Matilda is not going up to the Oscars podium to accept is because she's only 3 years old. Her mom can't do it either, or on her daughter's behalf, because, well, that whole thing's rather messy. Michelle Williams never married Heath Ledger and she was estranged from him at the time of his death.
After serving as symbolic stand-ins for Heath Ledger at the Oscars podium, the family should send the statuette to Matilda, not stuff it in their luggage and head Down Under to Australia. But that, according to the TMZ video, is what they're apparently planning to do with something that doesn't belong to them.
So they have no intention of honoring the deal that they reportedly struck with the Oscars? As academy executive director Bruce Davis explained to the Associated Press. "It's complicated, because there are two different questions that have to be answered. First, we have to decide who gets the job of accepting the award onstage on the night of the ceremony. And then there's the question of the eventual disposition of the posthumous statuette, which may not stay with the person who accepts it."
Davis goes on to clarify: "In the event that Heath Ledger should be selected as the supporting actor recipient, the statuette will be held in trust for his daughter by her mother, Michelle Williams, until Matilda reaches the age of 18. At that point, she may execute what we call an heir's agreement and keep the statuette forever — or, if she chooses not to do that, it will return to us."
Obviously, much confusion reigns over what to do about all of Ledger's awards this derby season. No one has yet claimed his Screen Actors Guild Award. "We are still holding it until the proper paperwork can be filled out," SAG Awards producer Kathy Connell tells Gold Derby via e-mail. But what does that mean? Is there a dispute over who signs? Or a debate over other terms of the paperwork? Will all of this be resolved soon? When we asked SAG such follow-up questions via return e-mail, the guild did not respond.
There's a lot of that dodging and ducking going around these days about the status of Ledger's showbiz awards for "The Dark Knight." The Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. says they shipped Heath's Golden Globe over to the office of his publicist Mara Buxbaum at ID-PR, who hasn't yet returned my call when I inquired about its status a few hours ago. Then I heard that Heath's Critics' Choice trophy was shipped to Warner Bros. awards office. When I asked those folks about the statuette's status, they said they don't have it. If I want an official comment, I should speak to Ms. Buxbaum.
Technically, no one should be accepting the Oscar on Heath Ledger's behalf at Sunday's ceremony. It's against the rules. Well, kind of a rule, an unofficial one that was cooked up after Marlon Brando staged that ridiculously embarrassing stunt at the 1972 awards, having fake "Indian" Sacheen Littlefeather ambush the podium to refuse his Oscar for "The Godfather." Since then the academy has made many exceptions to that "rule," but it's gotten tough on stand-in wannabees. For example, in 1981 it refused John Gielgud's request to let Michael York accept his supporting-actor trophy for "Arthur."
In general, exceptions to the rule seem to be cases involving deceased winners. In this instance, someone should represent Heath Ledger on stage because, as Oscarcast writer Bruce Vilanch tells Gold Derby, "We all want closure."
Oscarcast producers also want socko TV ratings and, having Heath Ledger's family at the podium uttering heartfelt words about their lost loved one, will be pure, great theater. We know that because they already passed their audition when they made an emotional appearance at the Australian Film Institute Awards in December.
One of the Oscars' greatest theatrical moments, historically speaking, occurred when another exception to the rule was made, one involving a winner who was still alive. In 1981 — the same year the academy pooh-poohed aging British theater actor John Gielgud — Oscar leaders caved to a sexy Hollywood superstar, Jane Fonda, when she insisted upon accepting the best-actor trophy for her ailing dad Henry ("On Golden Pond"). She ended up delivering an Oscar-worthy performance at the podium, hoisting his golden trophy up high as she addressed him, tearfully, while he watched on TV at home: "Dad, me and the grandkids will be right over!"
The last posthumous award went to cinematographer Conrad L. Hall, who won his third Oscar for "The Road to Perdition" in 2002. His son Jim Hall accepted on his behalf.
The only acting Oscar awarded posthumously was to Peter Finch who died in January 1977 while promoting "Network." When Finch's name was announced weeks later as the best actor of 1976, Paddy Chaefsky — who had won a third Oscar earlier in the evening for his scorching "Network" screenplay — came up to accept on his behalf. However, the firebrand writer — in defiance of the academy's orders — then called Finch's widow Aletha to the podium and she read out a speech he had written for her.
RELATED POSTS:
Heath Ledger's Ultimate Joke on the Oscars?
Heath Ledger's death-defying bid for 'The Dark Knight': Why so serious?
Heath Ledger wins top Aussie film award for 'The Dark Knight'
Does Heath Ledger have an Oscar I.O.U. for 'The Dark Knight'?
Posthumous Oscar nom for Heath Ledger's 'stunning' Joker?
Photo: TMZ, SAG Awards
Get Gold Derby on Twitter. Join the Gold Derby Group at Facebook. Become friends with Tom O'Neil on Facebook. Get Gold Derby RSS feed via Facebook. RSS Feedburner. RSS Atom.





Vito come back to reality, stupid statue ? It's an Academy award, I doubt you will ever come close to winning anything near the value of an Oscar. Your logic is stupid, should they just ignore Ledger's amazing performance because he did pills ?
Posted by: Joey | March 06, 2009 at 06:12 AM
Why can't the supportive parents, who helped raise him and encourage his dream of acting look after the award he rightfully one for such a fanatsic performance? Its not like Matilda will never visit her grandparents to see the award - she will see it each time she goes there to visit and will one day know its meaning, at which time she can then take it over. They've lost a son they knew for longer than Matilda's three years, and he accomplished something that his parents knew he would be honoured to accept - let them have it until his daughter can understand what it would have meant to him. Michelle knew the guy for 4 years and they seperated - this statue should be rightfully kept by his parents for now.
Posted by: Shoana | February 22, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Did the Oscars totally leave Heath Ledger off the "people who passed this year" or did I totally miss it????
Posted by: Walker | February 22, 2009 at 08:21 PM
The Academy needs to make sure those people don't leave with Matilda's statue. Or don't let them accept it at all.
Posted by: Bren | February 20, 2009 at 03:10 PM
In regards to proxys accepting Oscars: In 1985 Dame Peggy Ashcroft remained in the UK to attend a funeral for Sir Michael Redgrave. She requested PASSAGE co-star Victor Bannerjee to accept for her. The Academy (or perhaps the Producer) chose the more well-know (for ratings, perhaps) Angela Lansbury to accept. Not only did it shock Bannerjee who was was in the house but it soured Peggy on the Award as she claimed she didn't know and had never met Lansbury!!
Posted by: Barrie Miton | February 20, 2009 at 02:43 PM
I am amazed that anyone watches the Oscars any more considering they are so irrelevant with overpaid pretty heads giving each other awards.
Heath Ledger should not get any Oscar since he was stupid enough to use drugs. However Hollywood apparently likes to award people for stupid behavior and lawbreaking and seems like they will give him an Oscar posthumusly.
It should go to his kid since she is his decendent. I have never heard where your parents are your decendent. Now since she is a minor I would be cautious about money, but this is only a stupid statue.
Vito
Posted by: uncle_vito | February 20, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Isn't Heath Ledger their son?, or maybe I misunderstood. Besides, what would a 3 year old girl want with an oscar?; if you're worried about depriving Matilda of an object of sentimental value to her father -I can be sure she wouldn't know it either way. Let his parents have at least this much of their son, with out having to feel guilt for wanting it.
Posted by: JpR | February 20, 2009 at 12:18 PM
During the course of reading this article I had to double check if I had been redirected from the LA Times to TMZ or another gossip site.
Posted by: Becky | February 20, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Gee, what if he doesn't win? Whether or not anyone thinks this category is all sewn up, there's a chance it may not be Ledger who gets the award. No?
Posted by: Zoey | February 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Seriously? Who cares!? The guy died, let his family take it and they can decide who gets it. This is probably one of the worst articles I have ever read.
Posted by: Tim | February 20, 2009 at 09:36 AM
Petty, PETTY, P-E-T-T-Y !
The parents may be photogenic and heartwarming as a bowl of kittens, but the rule of inheritance is clear. And they are third in line. First would be Ledger's executor or agent, next is his child, THEN comes the parents. Everybody knows this, but in true Hollywood winge fashion they are trying to avoid the obvious in order to "look good". Stop pretending some great principle is being served.
Send in some generic stand in to accept the statue, then get the camera director to do a close up of the parents IN THE AUDIENCE, crying on cue.
Posted by: Bill T | February 20, 2009 at 09:04 AM
When Phillip Seymour Hoffman wins the Supporting Actor Oscar, does he have to give it to Michelle WIlliams or Heath Ledger's parents?
Posted by: Paul Flattery | February 20, 2009 at 08:45 AM
Don't all winners have to return the statuette to the Academy for engraving? The Academy can insist that the statuette not leave the Kodak Theater. If they have already agreed that Michelle Williams will be the custodian until Matilda is of age, all they have to do is ship it to her.
Posted by: Todd | February 20, 2009 at 06:35 AM
Don't all winners have to return the statuette to the Academy for engraving? The Academy can insist that the statuette not leave the Kodak Theater. If they have already agreed that Michelle Williams will be the custodian until Matilda is of age, all they have to do is ship it to her.
Posted by: Todd | February 20, 2009 at 06:35 AM
This is the most adolescent, sniping article I've ever read in a supposedly respectable newspaper. The tone is utterly insidious, and quite unnerving
Posted by: Mar L | February 20, 2009 at 05:32 AM
Really, I don't make it a habit of worrying about the writing quality of gossip articles, but I expect more from the LA Times. This article is horribly written, and, as a previous commenter stated, is fairly nasty.
"The Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. says they shipped Heath's Golden Globe over to the office of his publicist Mara Buxbaum at ID-PR, who hasn't yet returned my call when I inquired about its status a few hours ago."
What cunning research you have done! The woman doesn't return your call instantly, so there must be, as the pull-out quote states, a "bizarre mystery!" Rubbish!
And your comments about how Heath's family wants to "stuff [the statuette] in their luggage and head Down Under to Australia" rather than leave it with his estranged ex-girlfriend in America comes off as somewhat xenophobic. How dare they remove a statue from American soil!
I guess the point is that this is an unprecedented situation, and you are treating it as though there is only one obvious reasonable course of conduct.
Posted by: Brian | February 20, 2009 at 05:15 AM
Stop being trouble makers. Health's family (parents, Michelle and baby) are united and have a loving relationship which they keep private and not for public display. All the fruits of Heath's labor will go to Matilda. Who is the custodian until she comes of age is a family matter and does it really matter to us? Sally (his mom) and Dad lost a son. Is it such a bad thing to keep these awards until Matilda is old enough to want them? Give Michelle some time to move on with a new life, give Heath's family a moment to glow with pride at their beloved son's talent and success. Focus your attention on who should be a good minister of the arts; this country is way behind the rest of the world and needs one.
Posted by: fra | February 20, 2009 at 04:21 AM
Wow. This article is just downright nasty. Legder's parents are about to attend the biggest night in Hollywood on behalf of their deceased son. They are accepting the award. Kim Ledger isn't famous, he's simply being rushed by the paps while arriving at the airport. He doesn't know the technicalities of accepting the Oscar. When he said "forever" he was referring to the 15 years until Matilda legally owns it.
Jesus. Its their son. Matilda is their granddaughter. Its one big family. This whole "Huh! They're breaking the rules" angle is pathetic as well as exploitative.
Congratulations Gold Derby, you just lost a reader. You should be ashamed of yourselves, and who ever wrote this article as well as the editor who let it passed should be fired.
Posted by: Denny | February 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM
There is no "agreement", only the Academy's decision that the Oscar should be held by Michelle in trust for Matilda till she turns 18 and can sign the winner's agreement. The article says who accepts is being kept under wraps by Mark & Condon, just like everything else. If the family doesn't agree to the Academy's terms (and the TMZ quote indicates they won't), it appears Michelle will have to accept it as Matilda's trustee.
Posted by: RBBrittain | February 19, 2009 at 09:13 PM
If the Oscar rules dictate that the statuette belongs to adult children, why doesn't the Academy simply hold it in trust until his daughter turns 18? Why give it to anybody for "safekeeping" when the Academy could be the keeper?
Posted by: Lizzie | February 19, 2009 at 07:45 PM