Does an Oscar equal $100 million or $10 million?
Hollywood.com box office analyst Paul Dergarabedian has attempted the impossible: to put a price tag on winning the Oscar for best picture. It's tricky because of when a movie is released. For example, is it safe to say that "Slumdog Millionaire" made $97 million in real gold as a result of being in the running for a gold-plated statuette? That's how much it earned after it was nominated. It was clear at that point that it would win, because it had swept the key precursor prizes and all of the pundits were betting on it. But "Slumdog" wasn't released wide to theaters until nominations were unveiled. Previously, it had earned only $43 million when it was held back in limited release.
Or consider "The Departed," which was released more than three months before Academy Award nominations. At that point, it had already reaped $121 million, so it only got a $10-million bump after bids were out. Check out Paul's breakdown here.
Photo credit: Hollywood.com
OTHER POSTS:
Oscar predictions smackdown: Tom vs. Pete (the cliffhanger rematch)
Gold Derby nuggets: Pete Hammond: Best actress 'down to the wire' | Oscars leading men
Oscars bar 'Hurt Locker' producer from attending ceremony
Prediction: Sandra Bullock will beat Megan Fox for the Razzie
Get Gold Derby on Twitter. Join the Gold Derby Group at Facebook. Become friends with Tom O'Neil on Facebook. Get Gold Derby RSS feed via Facebook. RSS Feedburner. RSS Atom.









If aggregating all online talk is anything, it looks like Avatar will win--although I'm pleasantly surprised at how many peeps are talking about The Hurt Locker as well: http://www.spiral16.com/blog/2010/03/avatar-and-hurt-locker-lead-in-online-oscar-traffic-basterds-a-distant-third/
It'll be interesting to see if there's any correlation between online chatter and the winner...we''ll know Sunday!
Posted by: Eric Melin | March 04, 2010 at 03:35 PM