The Envelope Logo

Gold Derby

Tom O'Neil has the inside track on Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and all the award shows.

« Previous Post | Gold Derby Home | Next Post »

'Lost' Emmy mystery solved: Terry O'Quinn returns to the supporting-actor race

April 5, 2010 |  1:47 pm

Among all of the "Lost" cliffhangers looming as the past Emmy champ as best drama series (2006) airs its final TV episodes, fans wonder: Will Terry O'Quinn (winner, supporting actor in a drama, 2007) return to the derby after bowing out last year? And, if so, will he go lead or supporting? His role as the demonic "Man in Black" during the show's final season has been so prominent that he could certainly opt to jump up to the lead race.

But several months after Terry O'Quinn won in 2007, he told viewers of "The View" that he might not leap into any Emmy race: "My view was that, when you win an Emmy for a role, you ought to be ineligible for it again – for a while – maybe for a year or two or maybe not at all – till you get another role."

Lost terry oquinn

Apparently, O'Quinn now believes enough time has passed since his victory. He's rejoining the derby – and going supporting. He told our forums moderator Chris "Boomer" Beachum that he's going supporting because "all roles are supporting … whatever one calls them."

"I'm happy Terry's back in the race," cheers our other forums moderator Robert "Rob L" Licuria (AwardsHeaven.net). "He's the favorite."

Boomer notes that O'Quinn lived up to his promise to step aside after winning, "but obviously decided to take one last shot since the show is going off the air. He also has somewhat of a loophole in his theory since he isn't exactly playing 'John Locke' anymore. His character technically died and that body is inhabited by a dark possibly evil character usually called the 'Man in Black.'"

Here are the opinions of two of our forum posters. MissyGal says, "Well, that solidifies that O'Quinn and Michael Emerson will land supporting nods. As this point, I can't see O'Quinn losing." Hodag129 confesses, "Mixed feelings ... This essentially kills any shot Josh Holloway had at getting a nom. There's just too many other great supporting actors I cant see Lost getting 3 noms in this category. Unless Holloway does something amazing here in the finale and gets a lot of buzz."

O'Quinn's return to the Emmy supporting race sets up a sensitive clash: He'll compete against costar Michael Emerson, who won last year. Other strong contenders include 2009 nominees Aaron Paul ("Breaking Bad") and John Slattery ("Mad Men"). Patrick Dempsey ("Grey's Anatomy") and Vincent Kartheiser ("Mad Men") are also hefty contenders plus newcomers John Goodman ("Treme"), Craig T. Nelson ("Parenthood"), Chris Noth ("The Good Wife") and Campbell Scott and Martin Short ("Damages").

Below, watch O'Quinn's appearance on "The View" in 2008 when he voiced his plan to bow out of the derby. The discussion begins about five minutes into this clip.

OTHER POSTS:

Gold Derby nuggets: John Forsythe dies at 92 | Oscar shorts go long

40 years ago today: 'Patton' was released, then slapped Oscar

Flashback: 'Clash of the Titans' lost best picture to 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' … at the Saturn Awards

Emmy gamble: 'Mad Men' star Elisabeth Moss drops to supporting

Poll: Does Miley Cyrus deserve a Razzie for 'The Last Song'?

Again, Showtime ships first campaign mailer to Emmy voters

Can 'Avatar' crush 'Twilight: New Moon' at the MTV Movie Awards?

Photo: Terry O'Quinn at the Emmys in 2007 (Los Angeles Times) 

Get Gold Derby on Twitter. Join the Gold Derby Group at Facebook. Become friends with Tom O'Neil on Facebook. Get Gold Derby RSS feed via Facebook. RSS Feedburner. RSS Atom.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Comments

What about Nestor Carbonell? I thought he did a magnificent job in the episode that gave us the backstory of Richard Alpert.
I'd love to see him get nominated.

By Mr. O'Quinn's own logic, he is certainly worthy of a nomination this year, as he really isn't playing the same character on "Lost" for which he won last time. That being said, I am partial to the amazing Michael Emerson, who has taken Ben Linus from ruthless manipulator to a sad, broken, but (it seems) ultimately humbled/ possibly redeemed man. Both Emerson and O'Quinn have MADE this show, and I am glad that both fine actors have been acknowledged with an Emmy for their work on "Lost".

Congrats to him, but Nestor Carbonell needs to get nominated. His performance was unbelievable this season.

Interesting. He has a point. Why should actors win Emmys over and over again. It's the same role and maybe once you win, you shouldn't be nominated again and give others a chance as there are plenty of actors on TV. I remember both Candace Bergen & John Laroquette both removing themselves from competition due to winning so often for the same roles. They almost seemed embarassed to keep winning. Regarding last year's win for Emerson, he was good, but Aaron Paul was robbed. He was brilliant!

He should submit for actor because best supporting actor NEEDS to go to Nestor Carbonell for Ab Aeterno!!!!

It might be worth noting that he did submit in 2008, but did not even make the top eleven. It was only in 2009 when he sat out; however, it definitely made an impact as his episode from that season very well could have won him a second Emmy.

WHY supporting Actor only? He OWNS this show. Along with Michael Emerson, he has made this show as popular & loved as it is, it hasn't been just the story & charactors. Or Matthew Fox.

He should submit for LEAD actor, and WIN.


Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:


About the Blogger


Pop & Hiss



Categories


Archives
 



In Case You Missed It...